<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-contour-2026-50149 — Contour has Improper JWT Verification for Non-SNI Requests on Virtual Hosts with Fallback Certificate Enabled</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-contour-2026-50149</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: contour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. In versions 1.23.0 through 1.33.4, when an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token. This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`. As a workaround, do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: contour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. In versions 1.23.0 through 1.33.4, when an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token. This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`. As a workaround, do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-contour-2026-50149</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CLEANSTART-2026-CU86688 — Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-cu86688</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: external-dns&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security vulnerability affects the external-dns package. Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: external-dns&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security vulnerability affects the external-dns package. Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-cu86688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-358406</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358406</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-358406</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358406</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-50149</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-50149</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. In versions 1.23.0 through 1.33.4, when an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token. This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`. As a workaround, do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. In versions 1.23.0 through 1.33.4, when an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token. This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`. As a workaround, do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-50149</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g3xr-5w5j-w4q4 — Contour has Improper JWT Verification for Non-SNI Requests on Virtual Hosts with Fallback Certificate Enabled</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3xr-5w5j-w4q4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/projectcontour/contour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To list all `HTTPProxies` with this invalid configuration, run&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```bash
kubectl get httpproxies -A -o json | jq -r &amp;#39;
  .items[]
  | select(.spec.virtualhost | .tls.enableFallbackCertificate and .jwtProviders)
  | &amp;#34;Invalid HTTPProxy found: \(.metadata.namespace)/\(.metadata.name)&amp;#34;
&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Contour fallback certificate documentation: https://projectcontour.io/docs/main/config/tls-termination/#fallback-certificate
- Contour JWT verification documentation: https://projectcontou…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/projectcontour/contour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an `HTTPProxy` is configured with incompatible combination of both `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` and `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`, Contour does not reject the configuration. Consequently, requests from clients that do not send TLS SNI or send an unrecognized SNI (one that does not match any `HTTPProxy` FQDN) bypass configured JWT verification and are proxied to upstream services without a valid token.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To list all `HTTPProxies` with this invalid configuration, run&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```bash
kubectl get httpproxies -A -o json | jq -r &amp;#39;
  .items[]
  | select(.spec.virtualhost | .tls.enableFallbackCertificate and .jwtProviders)
  | &amp;#34;Invalid HTTPProxy found: \(.metadata.namespace)/\(.metadata.name)&amp;#34;
&amp;#39;
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in Contour v1.33.5. Contour now rejects and marks invalid any `HTTPProxy` resources that combine `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate: true` with `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Affected resources will receive a status  condition with the error reason `TLSIncompatibleFeatures`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do not enable `.spec.virtualhost.tls.enableFallbackCertificate` on `HTTPProxy` resources that also define `.spec.virtualhost.jwtProviders`. Remove one of the two settings to avoid the invalid configuration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Contour fallback certificate documentation: https://projectcontour.io/docs/main/config/tls-termination/#fallback-certificate
- Contour JWT verification documentation: https://projectcontou…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3xr-5w5j-w4q4</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
