<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 00:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-10831</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10831</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-10831</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10831</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BREW-breezy-CVE-2026-47734 — Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/brew-breezy-cve-2026-47734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: breezy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Homebrew: breezy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/brew-breezy-cve-2026-47734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CLEANSTART-2026-BR89758 — Security fix for CVE-2026-47734 applied in: kserve-storage-controller 0.19.0-r0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-br89758</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: kserve-storage-controller&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security vulnerability affects the kserve-storage-controller package. This issue is resolved in later releases. See references for vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; CleanStart: kserve-storage-controller&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security vulnerability affects the kserve-storage-controller package. This issue is resolved in later releases. See references for vulnerability details.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-br89758</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-326671</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-326671</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-326671</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-326671</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-47734</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run th…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run th…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj — Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xrvj-v92f-53gj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xrvj-v92f-53gj</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-2466 — Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2466</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via  add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) -
for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patched in 1.2.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetch…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2466</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:3117-1 — Security update for python-dulwich</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:3117-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for python-dulwich&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for python-dulwich&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:3117-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-47734</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-47734</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:25.10: dulwich, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: dulwich, Ubuntu:25.10: dulwich, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: dulwich&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes)  whose delta header declares a huge   dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would  allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP  smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git&amp;#39;s semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server&amp;#39;s repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-47734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2455 — Oracle Solaris Drittanbieterkomponenten: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2455</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Komponenten von Drittanbietern in Oracle Solaris ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Komponenten von Drittanbietern in Oracle Solaris ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
