<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 01:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-46274</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-46274</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-46274</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0783 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Microsoft Azure. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0783</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0783</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0783</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348062</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348062</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348062</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348062</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-46274</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46274</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled
work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether
the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but
never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash()
is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash
bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a
hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list
predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed
io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in
io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer
is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and
is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The
io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the
dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed
bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and
wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor
never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled
work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether
the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but
never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash()
is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash
bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a
hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list
predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed
io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in
io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer
is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and
is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The
io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the
dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed
bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and
wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor
never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46274</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-52w9-98q8-6pwf</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-52w9-98q8-6pwf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled
work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether
the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but
never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash()
is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash
bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a
hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list
predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed
io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in
io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer
is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and
is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The
io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the
dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed
bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and
wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor
never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled
work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether
the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but
never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash()
is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash
bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a
hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list
predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed
io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in
io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer
is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and
is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The
io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the
dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed
bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and
wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor
never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-52w9-98q8-6pwf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-46274 — io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-46274</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-46274</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-46274</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11014-1 — kernel-devel-7.0.12-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11014-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.12-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.12-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11014-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:22521-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22521-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22521-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-46274</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-46274</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 200 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending() io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash() is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0]. Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory. Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 200 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending() io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[] if the cancelled work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether the preceding entry in acct-&amp;gt;work_list has the same hash value, but never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash() is simply atomic_read(&amp;amp;work-&amp;gt;flags) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed io_kiocb is stored in wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0]. Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and is freed back to req_cachep, wq-&amp;gt;hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The io_wq is per-task (tctx-&amp;gt;io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory. Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-46274</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1827 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1827</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
