<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-46088</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-46088</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-46088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0731 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0731</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0731</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0731</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-327122</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327122</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-327122</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327122</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-46088</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46088</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names
buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items
remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0
error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks
maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track
of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic
before the return value is examined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified
strnlen() on an exhausted buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names
buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items
remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0
error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks
maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track
of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic
before the return value is examined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified
strnlen() on an exhausted buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-46088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-r965-2mvq-7ghh</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r965-2mvq-7ghh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names
buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items
remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0
error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks
maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track
of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic
before the return value is examined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified
strnlen() on an exhausted buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names
buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items
remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0
error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks
maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track
of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic
before the return value is examined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified
strnlen() on an exhausted buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r965-2mvq-7ghh</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-46088 — ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-46088</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-46088</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-46088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2674 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;amp;apos;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;amp;apos;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;amp;apos;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.(CVE-2025-39759)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: wilc1000: avoid buffer overflow in WID string configuration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the following copy overflow warning identi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;amp;apos;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;amp;apos;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;amp;apos;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.(CVE-2025-39759)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: wilc1000: avoid buffer overflow in WID string configuration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the following copy overflow warning identi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10954-1 — kernel-devel-7.0.11-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10954-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.11-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.11-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10954-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23066-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-46088</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-46088</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0). While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0 error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic before the return value is examined. Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified strnlen() on an exhausted buffer. Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: control: Validate buf_len before strnlen() in snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names() advances pointer p through the names buffer while decrementing buf_len. If buf_len reaches zero but items remain, the next iteration calls strnlen(p, 0). While strnlen(p, 0) returns 0 and would hit the existing name_len == 0 error path, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE&amp;#39;s fortified strnlen() first checks maxlen against __builtin_dynamic_object_size(). When Clang loses track of p&amp;#39;s object size inside the loop, this triggers a BRK exception panic before the return value is examined. Add a buf_len == 0 guard at the loop entry to prevent calling fortified strnlen() on an exhausted buffer. Found by kernel fuzz testing through Xiaomi Smartphone.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-46088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1700 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
