<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-45859</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-45859</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-45859</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0831 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0831</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0831</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0831</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347952</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347952</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347952</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347952</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-45859</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45859</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso
packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are
now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after
skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership
of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use
count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we
can do a 2nd check at reinject time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids
packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms
entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about
unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case
dying entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will
be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso
packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are
now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after
skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership
of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use
count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we
can do a 2nd check at reinject time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids
packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms
entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about
unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case
dying entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will
be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45859</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-v8w5-25mx-q5r4</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v8w5-25mx-q5r4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso
packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are
now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after
skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership
of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use
count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we
can do a 2nd check at reinject time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids
packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms
entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about
unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case
dying entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will
be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso
packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are
now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after
skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership
of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use
count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we
can do a 2nd check at reinject time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids
packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms
entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about
unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case
dying entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will
be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v8w5-25mx-q5r4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-45859 — netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-45859</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-45859</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-45859</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2869 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2869</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arm C1-Ultra, C1-Premium, Neoverse V3 &amp;amp;amp; V3AE, Neoverse V2, Neoverse V1, Neoverse-N2, Neoverse-N1, Cortex-X925, Cortex-X4, Cortex-X3, Cortex-X2, Cortex-X1 &amp;amp;amp; X1C, Cortex-A710, Cortex-A78, A78AE &amp;amp;amp; A78C, Cortex-A77, Cortex-A76 &amp;amp;amp; A76A may allow writes to resources owned by a higher exception level.(CVE-2025-10263)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: let smbd_destroy() call disable_work_sync(&amp;amp;amp;info-&amp;amp;gt;post_send_credits_work)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In smbd_destroy() we may destroy the memory so we better
wait until post_send_credits_work is no longer pending
and will never be started again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I actually just hit the case using rxe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 138 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1032 rxe_post_recv+0x1ee/0x480 [rdma_rxe]
...
[ 5305.686979] [    T138]  smbd_post_recv+0x445/0xc10 [cifs]
[ 5305.687135] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687149] [    T138]  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30
[ 5305.687185] [    T138]  ? __pfx_smbd_post_recv+0x10/0x10 [cifs]
[ 5305.687329] [    T138]  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
[ 5305.687356] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687368] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687378] [    T138]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x60
[ 5305.687389] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687399] [    T138]  ? get_receive_buffer+0x168…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arm C1-Ultra, C1-Premium, Neoverse V3 &amp;amp;amp; V3AE, Neoverse V2, Neoverse V1, Neoverse-N2, Neoverse-N1, Cortex-X925, Cortex-X4, Cortex-X3, Cortex-X2, Cortex-X1 &amp;amp;amp; X1C, Cortex-A710, Cortex-A78, A78AE &amp;amp;amp; A78C, Cortex-A77, Cortex-A76 &amp;amp;amp; A76A may allow writes to resources owned by a higher exception level.(CVE-2025-10263)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: let smbd_destroy() call disable_work_sync(&amp;amp;amp;info-&amp;amp;gt;post_send_credits_work)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In smbd_destroy() we may destroy the memory so we better
wait until post_send_credits_work is no longer pending
and will never be started again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I actually just hit the case using rxe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 138 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1032 rxe_post_recv+0x1ee/0x480 [rdma_rxe]
...
[ 5305.686979] [    T138]  smbd_post_recv+0x445/0xc10 [cifs]
[ 5305.687135] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687149] [    T138]  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30
[ 5305.687185] [    T138]  ? __pfx_smbd_post_recv+0x10/0x10 [cifs]
[ 5305.687329] [    T138]  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
[ 5305.687356] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687368] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687378] [    T138]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x60
[ 5305.687389] [    T138]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5305.687399] [    T138]  ? get_receive_buffer+0x168…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2869</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21555-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23066-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-45859</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-45859</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 175 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue: If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment(). Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet. Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we can do a 2nd check at reinject time. For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry. While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case dying entries. This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO. Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 175 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue: If an application did not set the &amp;#39;F_GSO&amp;#39; capability flag and a gso packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after skb_gso_segment().  In that case, we did have exclusive ownership of the skb and its associated conntrack entry.  The elevated use count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment(). Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet. Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we can do a 2nd check at reinject time. For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry. While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about unconfirmed entries with a refcnt &amp;gt; 1, there is no need to special-case dying entries. This only happens with UDP.  With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will be the TCP SYN, those aren&amp;#39;t aggregated by GRO. Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-45859</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1700 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
