<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-43245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-43245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-43245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0809 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0809</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0809</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0809</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347872</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347872</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347872</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347872</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-43245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while
we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash()
almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks
deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing
in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and
be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of
the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while
we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash()
almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks
deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing
in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and
be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of
the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mq97-h32x-42x9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mq97-h32x-42x9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while
we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash()
almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks
deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing
in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and
be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of
the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while
we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash()
almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks
deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing
in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and
be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of
the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mq97-h32x-42x9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-43245 — ntfs: -&gt;d_compare() must not block</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-43245</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-43245</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-43245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2754 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2754</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbdev: fix potential buffer overflow in do_register_framebuffer()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation may lead to buffer overflow when:
1.  Unregistration creates NULL gaps in registered_fb[]
2.  All array slots become occupied despite num_registered_fb &amp;amp;lt; FB_MAX
3.  The registration loop exceeds array bounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add boundary check to prevent registered_fb[FB_MAX] access.(CVE-2025-38702)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfs: validate record offset in hfsplus_bmap_alloc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus_bmap_alloc can trigger a crash if a
record offset or length is larger than node_size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   15.264282] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfsplus_bmap_alloc+0x887/0x8b0
[   15.265192] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881085ca188 by task test/183
[   15.265949]
[   15.266163] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 183 Comm: test Not tainted 6.17.0-rc2-gc17b750b3ad9 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[   15.266165] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   15.266167] Call Trace:
[   15.266168]  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
[   15.266169]  dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
[   15.266173]  print_report+0xd0/0x660
[   15.266181]  kasan_report+0xce/0x100
[   15.266185]  hfsplus_bmap_alloc+0x887/0x8b0
[   15.266208]  hfs_btree_inc_height.isra.0+0xd5/0x7c0
[   15.266217]  hfsplus_brec_insert+0x870/0xb00
[   15.266222]  __hfsplus_ext_write_extent+…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fbdev: fix potential buffer overflow in do_register_framebuffer()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation may lead to buffer overflow when:
1.  Unregistration creates NULL gaps in registered_fb[]
2.  All array slots become occupied despite num_registered_fb &amp;amp;lt; FB_MAX
3.  The registration loop exceeds array bounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add boundary check to prevent registered_fb[FB_MAX] access.(CVE-2025-38702)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfs: validate record offset in hfsplus_bmap_alloc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hfsplus_bmap_alloc can trigger a crash if a
record offset or length is larger than node_size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[   15.264282] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfsplus_bmap_alloc+0x887/0x8b0
[   15.265192] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881085ca188 by task test/183
[   15.265949]
[   15.266163] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 183 Comm: test Not tainted 6.17.0-rc2-gc17b750b3ad9 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[   15.266165] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   15.266167] Call Trace:
[   15.266168]  &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
[   15.266169]  dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
[   15.266173]  print_report+0xd0/0x660
[   15.266181]  kasan_report+0xce/0x100
[   15.266185]  hfsplus_bmap_alloc+0x887/0x8b0
[   15.266208]  hfs_btree_inc_height.isra.0+0xd5/0x7c0
[   15.266217]  hfsplus_brec_insert+0x870/0xb00
[   15.266222]  __hfsplus_ext_write_extent+…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2754</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-43245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-43245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 232 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block ... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash() almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now. Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 232 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: -&amp;gt;d_compare() must not block ... so don&amp;#39;t use __getname() there.  Switch it (and ntfs_d_hash(), while we are at it) to kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_NOWAIT).  Yes, ntfs_d_hash() almost certainly can do with smaller allocations, but let ntfs folks deal with that - keep the allocation size as-is for now. Stop abusing names_cachep in ntfs, period - various uses of that thing in there have nothing to do with pathnames; just use k[mz]alloc() and be done with that.  For now let&amp;#39;s keep sizes as-in, but AFAICS none of the users actually want PATH_MAX.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-43245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1405 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1405</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
