https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:30:41 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14800 bdu:2026-14800 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14800 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-43042 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-43042 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1203 certfr-2026-avi-1203 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1203 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347807 EUVD-2026-347807 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347807 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43042 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair</p> <p>The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses.</p> <p>This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot.</p> <p>Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair</p> <p>The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses.</p> <p>This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot.</p> <p>Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43042 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j45g-66j9-q94m <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair</p> <p>The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses.</p> <p>This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot.</p> <p>Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair</p> <p>The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses.</p> <p>This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot.</p> <p>Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j45g-66j9-q94m https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-43042 msrc_CVE-2026-43042 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-43042 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-43042 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 233 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses. This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot. Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 233 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mpls: add seqcount to protect the platform_label{,s} pair The RCU-protected codepaths (mpls_forward, mpls_dump_routes) can have an inconsistent view of platform_labels vs platform_label in case of a concurrent resize (resize_platform_label_table, under platform_mutex). This can lead to OOB accesses. This patch adds a seqcount, so that we get a consistent snapshot. Note that mpls_label_ok is also susceptible to this, so the check against RTA_DST in rtm_to_route_config, done outside platform_mutex, is not sufficient. This value gets passed to mpls_label_ok once more in both mpls_route_add and mpls_route_del, so there is no issue, but that additional check must not be removed.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-43042 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1346 <p>Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.</p> <p>Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1346