<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 06:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-08727</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-08727</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-08727</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-08727</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-openbao-2026-33757 — OpenBao lacks user confirmation for OIDC direct callback mode</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-openbao-2026-33757</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: openbao&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: openbao&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-openbao-2026-33757</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2026-16031</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2026-16031</link>
      <description>cnvd-2026-16031</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2026-16031</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-337333</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-337333</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-337333</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-337333</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-33757</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-33757</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.2, OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`. This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued. Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication. This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-33757</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3 — OpenBao lacks user confirmation for OIDC direct callback mode</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/openbao/openbao&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/openbao/openbao&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBao does not prompt for user confirmation when logging in via JWT/OIDC and a role with `callback_mode` set to `direct`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This allows an attacker to start an authentication request and perform &amp;#34;remote phishing&amp;#34; by having the victim visit the URL and automatically log-in to the session of the attacker. Despite being based on the authorization code flow, the  `direct` mode calls back directly to the API and allows an attacker to poll for an OpenBao token until it is issued.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
Version 2.5.2 includes an additional confirmation screen for `direct` type logins that requires manual user interaction in order to finish the authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds
This issue can be worked around either by removing any roles with `callback_mode=direct` or enforcing confirmation for every session on the token issuer side for the Client ID used by OpenBao.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7q7g-x6vg-xpc3</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10438-1 — openbao-2.5.2-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10438-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;openbao-2.5.2-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;openbao-2.5.2-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10438-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0864 — OpenBao: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0864</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenBao ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Cross Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenBao ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Cross Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
