<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>ALSA-2026:19066 — Moderate: openssl security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:19066</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:10: openssl, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-perl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key (CVE-2026-31790)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:10: openssl, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-perl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key (CVE-2026-31790)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:19066</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-11013</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11013</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-11013</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11013</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-31790</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31790</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: openssl, Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:23: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: openssl, Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:23: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0403 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécutio…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0403</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0403</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0403</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-317205</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317205</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-317205</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317205</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-31790</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31790</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish
a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to
a malicious peer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the
previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data
leakage to an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1
on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero.
As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to
the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of
the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an
attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key,
then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided
ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM
ciphertext.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or
EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate
the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish
a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to
a malicious peer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the
previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data
leakage to an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1
on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero.
As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to
the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of
the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an
attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key,
then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided
ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM
ciphertext.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or
EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate
the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vgxx-5xj5-q97x</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgxx-5xj5-q97x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish
a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to
a malicious peer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the
previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data
leakage to an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1
on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero.
As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to
the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of
the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an
attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key,
then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided
ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM
ciphertext.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or
EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate
the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish
a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to
a malicious peer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the
previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data
leakage to an attacker.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1
on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero.
As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to
the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of
the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an
attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key,
then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided
ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM
ciphertext.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or
EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate
the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgxx-5xj5-q97x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-31790 — Incorrect Failure Handling in RSA KEM RSASVE Encapsulation</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31790</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-31790</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2041 — openssl security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2041</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based
server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may
result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences
such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both
the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate
usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672
recommends that clients treat as &amp;amp;apos;unusable&amp;amp;apos; any TLSA records that have the PKIX
certificate usages.  These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable
to this issue.  Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and
ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a
TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the
FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension
is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL
Number extension is missing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which
leads to a Denial of Service for an application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When CRL processing an…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based
server authentication, when paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may
result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the client side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences
such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the issue only affects clients that make use of TLSA records with both
the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2) certificate
usage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672
recommends that clients treat as &amp;amp;apos;unusable&amp;amp;apos; any TLSA records that have the PKIX
certificate usages.  These SMTP (or other similar) clients are not vulnerable
to this issue.  Conversely, any clients that support only the PKIX usages, and
ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The client would also need to be communicating with a server that publishes a
TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the
FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-28387)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: When a delta CRL that contains a Delta CRL Indicator extension
is processed a NULL pointer dereference might happen if the required CRL
Number extension is missing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which
leads to a Denial of Service for an application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When CRL processing an…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2041</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10533-1 — libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-4.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10533-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-4.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-4.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10533-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:12195 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 6.2.2 release and security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:12195</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;tomcat: Client certificate verification bypass due to virtual host mapping tomcat: security constraint bypass with HTTP/0.9 openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key Apache Tomcat: Apache Tomcat: Improper Input Validation vulnerability due to incomplete fix&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;tomcat: Client certificate verification bypass due to virtual host mapping tomcat: security constraint bypass with HTTP/0.9 openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key Apache Tomcat: Apache Tomcat: Improper Input Validation vulnerability due to incomplete fix&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:12195</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RLSA-2026:39297 — Moderate: edk2 security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:39297</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Rocky Linux:10: edk2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EDK (Embedded Development Kit) is a project to enable UEFI support for Virtual Machines. This package contains a sample 64-bit UEFI firmware for QEMU and KVM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key (CVE-2026-31790)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to NULL pointer dereference in CMS EnvelopedData processing (CVE-2026-28390)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* edk2/x64: re-enable legacy kernel loader [rhel-10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-182421)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Rocky Linux:10: edk2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EDK (Embedded Development Kit) is a project to enable UEFI support for Virtual Machines. This package contains a sample 64-bit UEFI firmware for QEMU and KVM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: openssl: Information Disclosure from Uninitialized Memory via Invalid RSA Public Key (CVE-2026-31790)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to NULL pointer dereference in CMS EnvelopedData processing (CVE-2026-28390)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* edk2/x64: re-enable legacy kernel loader [rhel-10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-182421)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:39297</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:1213-1 — Security update for openssl-3</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:1213-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:1213-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-31790</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31790</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:24.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:25.10: edk2, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl and 3 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to a malicious peer. Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data leakage to an attacker. RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1 on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero. As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced. If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key, then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM ciphertext. As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate the issue. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:24.04:LTS: openssl-fips, Ubuntu:25.10: edk2, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl and 3 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: Applications using RSASVE key encapsulation to establish a secret encryption key can send contents of an uninitialized memory buffer to a malicious peer. Impact summary: The uninitialized buffer might contain sensitive data from the previous execution of the application process which leads to sensitive data leakage to an attacker. RSA_public_encrypt() returns the number of bytes written on success and -1 on error. The affected code tests only whether the return value is non-zero. As a result, if RSA encryption fails, encapsulation can still return success to the caller, set the output lengths, and leave the caller to use the contents of the ciphertext buffer as if a valid KEM ciphertext had been produced. If applications use EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() with RSA/RSASVE on an attacker-supplied invalid RSA public key without first validating that key, then this may cause stale or uninitialized contents of the caller-provided ciphertext buffer to be disclosed to the attacker in place of the KEM ciphertext. As a workaround calling EVP_PKEY_public_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check_quick() before EVP_PKEY_encapsulate() will mitigate the issue. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.1 and 3.0 are affected by this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0995 — OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0995</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
