<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-31642</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31642</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31642</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0526 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0526</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-323493</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-323493</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-323493</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-323493</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-31642</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31642</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu()
rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading
/proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s
been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix
this by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that
are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means
there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list
here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from
the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu()
rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading
/proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s
been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix
this by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that
are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means
there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list
here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from
the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31642</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-q4rh-73g2-jf4j</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-q4rh-73g2-jf4j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu()
rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading
/proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s
been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix
this by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that
are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means
there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list
here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from
the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu()
rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading
/proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s
been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix
this by:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that
are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means
there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list
here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from
the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-q4rh-73g2-jf4j</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-31642 — rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31642</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-31642</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31642</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3156 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3156</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect &amp;amp;quot;concurrent&amp;amp;quot; writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In handling &amp;amp;quot;superseeded&amp;amp;quot; writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of &amp;amp;quot;two-primaries&amp;amp;quot; handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which means that other than for &amp;amp;quot;test cases&amp;amp;quot;,
this code path is never taken in real life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
&amp;amp;quot;write conflicts&amp;amp;quot;, but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that&amp;amp;apos;s their fault.(CVE-2025-38708)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: mwifiex: Initialize the chan_stats array to zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The adapter-&amp;amp;gt…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect &amp;amp;quot;concurrent&amp;amp;quot; writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In handling &amp;amp;quot;superseeded&amp;amp;quot; writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of &amp;amp;quot;two-primaries&amp;amp;quot; handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which means that other than for &amp;amp;quot;test cases&amp;amp;quot;,
this code path is never taken in real life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
&amp;amp;quot;write conflicts&amp;amp;quot;, but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that&amp;amp;apos;s their fault.(CVE-2025-38708)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: mwifiex: Initialize the chan_stats array to zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The adapter-&amp;amp;gt…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3156</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-31642</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31642</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 226 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu() rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading /proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop. This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix this by: Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that. rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 226 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet-&amp;gt;calls list to use list_del_rcu() rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading /proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop. This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that&amp;#39;s been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix this by: Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means there&amp;#39;s no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that. rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31642</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1279 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
