<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-11324</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11324</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-11324</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11324</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-31622</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31622</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31622</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0526 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0526</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347736</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347736</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347736</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347736</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-31622</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31622</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3
or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade
rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the
cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the
cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round
follows).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is
sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver
actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the
cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each
round.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed
the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;)
fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3
or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade
rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the
cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the
cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round
follows).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is
sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver
actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the
cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each
round.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed
the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;)
fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31622</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3r85-565g-4jhq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3r85-565g-4jhq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3
or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade
rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the
cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the
cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round
follows).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is
sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver
actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the
cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each
round.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed
the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;)
fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3
or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade
rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the
cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the
cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round
follows).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is
sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver
actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the
cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each
round.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed
the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;)
fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3r85-565g-4jhq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-31622 — NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31622</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-31622</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31622</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3155 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3155</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The code in bmc150-accel-core.c unconditionally calls
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt() in the iio_buffer_setup_ops,
such as on the runtime PM resume path giving a kernel
splat like this if the device has no interrupts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
  address 00000001 when read&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PC is at bmc150_accel_set_interrupt+0x98/0x194
LR is at __pm_runtime_resume+0x5c/0x64
(...)
Call trace:
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt from bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable+0x40/0x108
bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable from __iio_update_buffers+0xbe0/0xcbc
__iio_update_buffers from enable_store+0x84/0xc8
enable_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x1b4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug seems to have been in the driver since the beginning,
but it only manifests recently, I do not know why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Store the IRQ number in the state struct, as this is a common
pattern in other drivers, then use this to determine if we have
IRQ support or not.(CVE-2025-68330)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: Fix potential use-after-free in sama5d2_adc driver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;at91_adc_interrupt can call at91_adc_touch_data_handler function
to start the work by schedule_work(&amp;amp;amp;st-&amp;amp;gt;touch_st.workq).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we remove the module which will call at91_adc_remove to
make cleanup, it will free indio_d…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The code in bmc150-accel-core.c unconditionally calls
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt() in the iio_buffer_setup_ops,
such as on the runtime PM resume path giving a kernel
splat like this if the device has no interrupts:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
  address 00000001 when read&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PC is at bmc150_accel_set_interrupt+0x98/0x194
LR is at __pm_runtime_resume+0x5c/0x64
(...)
Call trace:
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt from bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable+0x40/0x108
bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable from __iio_update_buffers+0xbe0/0xcbc
__iio_update_buffers from enable_store+0x84/0xc8
enable_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x1b4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This bug seems to have been in the driver since the beginning,
but it only manifests recently, I do not know why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Store the IRQ number in the state struct, as this is a common
pattern in other drivers, then use this to determine if we have
IRQ support or not.(CVE-2025-68330)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: Fix potential use-after-free in sama5d2_adc driver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;at91_adc_interrupt can call at91_adc_touch_data_handler function
to start the work by schedule_work(&amp;amp;amp;st-&amp;amp;gt;touch_st.workq).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we remove the module which will call at91_adc_remove to
make cleanup, it will free indio_d…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3155</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10703-1 — kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10703-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10703-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:21876-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21876-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21876-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-31622</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31622</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3 or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round follows). ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each round. Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed the buffer. Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;) fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFC: digital: Bounds check NFC-A cascade depth in SDD response handler The NFC-A anti-collision cascade in digital_in_recv_sdd_res() appends 3 or 4 bytes to target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 on each round, but the number of cascade rounds is controlled entirely by the peer device.  The peer sets the cascade tag in the SDD_RES (deciding 3 vs 4 bytes) and the cascade-incomplete bit in the SEL_RES (deciding whether another round follows). ISO 14443-3 limits NFC-A to three cascade levels and target-&amp;gt;nfcid1 is sized accordingly (NFC_NFCID1_MAXSIZE = 10), but nothing in the driver actually enforces this.  This means a malicious peer can keep the cascade running, writing past the heap-allocated nfc_target with each round. Fix this by rejecting the response when the accumulated UID would exceed the buffer. Commit e329e71013c9 (&amp;#34;NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays&amp;#34;) fixed similar missing checks against the same field on the NCI path.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31622</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1279 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
