<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12358</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12358</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12358</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12358</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-31590</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31590</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-31590</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0526 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0526</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0526</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-327017</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327017</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-327017</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327017</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-31590</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31590</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the
WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct kvm_enc_region range = {
          .addr = 0,
          .size = -1ul,
  };&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to
verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34;
and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater
than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the
number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the
WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct kvm_enc_region range = {
          .addr = 0,
          .size = -1ul,
  };&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to
verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34;
and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater
than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the
number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-31590</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5gvm-8x7g-h7xx</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5gvm-8x7g-h7xx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the
WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct kvm_enc_region range = {
          .addr = 0,
          .size = -1ul,
  };&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to
verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34;
and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater
than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the
number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the
WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct kvm_enc_region range = {
          .addr = 0,
          .size = -1ul,
  };&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;__vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to
verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34;
and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater
than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the
number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5gvm-8x7g-h7xx</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-31590 — KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31590</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-31590</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-31590</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2234 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2234</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, arm64: Force 8-byte alignment for JIT buffer to prevent atomic tearing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct bpf_plt contains a u64 target field. Currently, the BPF JIT
allocator requests an alignment of 4 bytes (sizeof(u32)) for the JIT
buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because the base address of the JIT buffer can be 4-byte aligned (e.g.,
ending in 0x4 or 0xc), the relative padding logic in build_plt() fails
to ensure that target lands on an 8-byte boundary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to two issues:
1. UBSAN reports misaligned-access warnings when dereferencing the
   structure.
2. More critically, target is updated concurrently via WRITE_ONCE() in
   bpf_arch_text_poke() while the JIT&amp;amp;apos;d code executes ldr. On arm64,
   64-bit loads/stores are only guaranteed to be single-copy atomic if
   they are 64-bit aligned. A misaligned target risks a torn read,
   causing the JIT to jump to a corrupted address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by increasing the allocation alignment requirement to 8 bytes
(sizeof(u64)) in bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(). This anchors the base of
the JIT buffer to an 8-byte boundary, allowing the relative padding math
in build_plt() to correctly align the target field.(CVE-2026-23383)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: validate p_idx bounds in ext4_ext_correct_indexes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4_ext_correct_indexes() walks up the extent tree correcting
index entries when the f…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, arm64: Force 8-byte alignment for JIT buffer to prevent atomic tearing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct bpf_plt contains a u64 target field. Currently, the BPF JIT
allocator requests an alignment of 4 bytes (sizeof(u32)) for the JIT
buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because the base address of the JIT buffer can be 4-byte aligned (e.g.,
ending in 0x4 or 0xc), the relative padding logic in build_plt() fails
to ensure that target lands on an 8-byte boundary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to two issues:
1. UBSAN reports misaligned-access warnings when dereferencing the
   structure.
2. More critically, target is updated concurrently via WRITE_ONCE() in
   bpf_arch_text_poke() while the JIT&amp;amp;apos;d code executes ldr. On arm64,
   64-bit loads/stores are only guaranteed to be single-copy atomic if
   they are 64-bit aligned. A misaligned target risks a torn read,
   causing the JIT to jump to a corrupted address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by increasing the allocation alignment requirement to 8 bytes
(sizeof(u64)) in bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(). This anchors the base of
the JIT buffer to an 8-byte boundary, allowing the relative padding math
in build_plt() to correctly align the target field.(CVE-2026-23383)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: validate p_idx bounds in ext4_ext_correct_indexes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4_ext_correct_indexes() walks up the extent tree correcting
index entries when the f…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2234</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10703-1 — kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10703-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.0.3-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10703-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:22108-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22108-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22108-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-31590</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31590</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 191 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:   struct kvm_enc_region range = {           .addr = 0,           .size = -1ul,   };   __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range); Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future. 	if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX) 		return -EINVAL; Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 191 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SEV: Drop WARN on large size for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION Drop the WARN in sev_pin_memory() on npages overflowing an int, as the WARN is comically trivially to trigger from userspace, e.g. by doing:   struct kvm_enc_region range = {           .addr = 0,           .size = -1ul,   };   __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION, &amp;amp;range); Note, the checks in sev_mem_enc_register_region() that presumably exist to verify the incoming address+size are completely worthless, as both &amp;#34;addr&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;size&amp;#34; are u64s and SEV is 64-bit only, i.e. they _can&amp;#39;t_ be greater than ULONG_MAX.  That wart will be cleaned up in the near future. 	if (range-&amp;gt;addr &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX || range-&amp;gt;size &amp;gt; ULONG_MAX) 		return -EINVAL; Opportunistically add a comment to explain why the code calculates the number of pages the &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; way, e.g. instead of just shifting @ulen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-31590</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1279 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
