<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 04:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1056 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Splunk. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaq…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1056</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1056</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1056</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-274834</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-274834</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-274834</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-274834</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-28277</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-28277</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint is an implementation of LangGraph CheckpointSaver that uses SQLite DB (both sync and async, via aiosqlite). In version 1.0.9 and prior, LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded. No known patch is public.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint is an implementation of LangGraph CheckpointSaver that uses SQLite DB (both sync and async, via aiosqlite). In version 1.0.9 and prior, LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded. No known patch is public.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-28277</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g48c-2wqr-h844 — LangGraph checkpoint loading has unsafe msgpack deserialization</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g48c-2wqr-h844</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: langgraph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a **post-exploitation / defense-in-depth** issue. Exploitation requires the ability to write attacker-controlled checkpoint bytes at rest. In most deployments that prerequisite already implies a serious incident; the additional risk is turning “checkpoint-store write access” into code execution in the application runtime, which can expand blast radius (for example by exposing environment variables or cloud credentials available to the runtime).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no evidence of exploitation in the wild, and LangGraph is not aware of a practical exploitation path in existing deployments today. This change is intended to reduce the blast radius of a checkpoint-store compromise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected users / systems&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users may be affected if they:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- use a persistent checkpointer (database, remote store, shared filesystem, etc.),
- load/resume from checkpoints, and
- operate in an environment where an attacker could gain privileged write access to checkpoint data in the backing store.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue requires the attacker to be able to modify persisted checkpoint bytes (or to compromise a trusted…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: langgraph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a **post-exploitation / defense-in-depth** issue. Exploitation requires the ability to write attacker-controlled checkpoint bytes at rest. In most deployments that prerequisite already implies a serious incident; the additional risk is turning “checkpoint-store write access” into code execution in the application runtime, which can expand blast radius (for example by exposing environment variables or cloud credentials available to the runtime).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no evidence of exploitation in the wild, and LangGraph is not aware of a practical exploitation path in existing deployments today. This change is intended to reduce the blast radius of a checkpoint-store compromise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected users / systems&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users may be affected if they:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- use a persistent checkpointer (database, remote store, shared filesystem, etc.),
- load/resume from checkpoints, and
- operate in an environment where an attacker could gain privileged write access to checkpoint data in the backing store.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue requires the attacker to be able to modify persisted checkpoint bytes (or to compromise a trusted…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g48c-2wqr-h844</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-83</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-83</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: langgraph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint is an implementation of LangGraph CheckpointSaver that uses SQLite DB (both sync and async, via aiosqlite). In version 1.0.9 and prior, LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded. No known patch is public.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: langgraph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint is an implementation of LangGraph CheckpointSaver that uses SQLite DB (both sync and async, via aiosqlite). In version 1.0.9 and prior, LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded. No known patch is public.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-83</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1407 — IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1407</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
