<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:33:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12498</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12498</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12498</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12498</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-23460</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23460</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23460</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0547 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0547</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0547</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-315545</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315545</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-315545</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315545</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-23460</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23460</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23460</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-cx6c-45wp-f5pr</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cx6c-45wp-f5pr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt;
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cx6c-45wp-f5pr</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20826-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20826-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20826-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:21834-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21834-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21834-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-23460</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23460</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 232 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2]. ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN, TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT. When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt; rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference. Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect(). [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 232 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2]. ROSE sockets use four sk-&amp;gt;sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN, TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT. When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites rose-&amp;gt;neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket is left with rose-&amp;gt;state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-&amp;gt;neighbour == NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -&amp;gt; rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference. Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect(). [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23460</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0985 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0985</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um unter anderem einen Denial of Service-Angriff auszuführen oder um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um unter anderem einen Denial of Service-Angriff auszuführen oder um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
