<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-23355</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23355</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23355</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-321451</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-321451</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-321451</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-321451</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-23355</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23355</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion.
This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the
deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the
work which will issue the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after
the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns
non-zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc,
and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel
the work after clearing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the following scenario can happen:
1) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred
   qc.
4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is
   currently NOT canceled.
5) Port is reset.
6) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in
   flight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion.
This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the
deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the
work which will issue the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after
the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns
non-zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc,
and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel
the work after clearing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the following scenario can happen:
1) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred
   qc.
4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is
   currently NOT canceled.
5) Port is reset.
6) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in
   flight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23355</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-8672-3h73-hv9p</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8672-3h73-hv9p</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion.
This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the
deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the
work which will issue the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after
the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns
non-zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc,
and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel
the work after clearing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the following scenario can happen:
1) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred
   qc.
4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is
   currently NOT canceled.
5) Port is reset.
6) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in
   flight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion.
This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if
ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the
deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the
work which will issue the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after
the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns
non-zero.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc,
and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel
the work after clearing the deferred qc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the following scenario can happen:
1) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred
   qc.
4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is
   currently NOT canceled.
5) Port is reset.
6) One or several NCQ commands are queued.
7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc.
8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in
   flight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8672-3h73-hv9p</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-23355</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23355</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 82 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc. ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion. This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the work which will issue the deferred qc. Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns non-zero. While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc, and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel the work after clearing the deferred qc. This means that the following scenario can happen: 1) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc. 3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred    qc. 4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is    currently NOT canceled. 5) Port is reset. 6) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc. 8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in    flight. The work i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 82 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc. ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion. This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the work which will issue the deferred qc. Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap-&amp;gt;ops-&amp;gt;qc_defer() returns non-zero. While we hold the ap-&amp;gt;lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc, and the work itself holds the ap-&amp;gt;lock, the code currently does not cancel the work after clearing the deferred qc. This means that the following scenario can happen: 1) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc. 3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred    qc. 4) Timeout or error happens, ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is    currently NOT canceled. 5) Port is reset. 6) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap-&amp;gt;deferred_qc. 8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in    flight. The work i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23355</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0861 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0861</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
