<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12323</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12323</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12323</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12323</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-23326</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23326</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23326</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0497 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0497</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0497</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0497</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-315475</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315475</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-315475</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315475</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-23326</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23326</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;),
the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer
free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using
list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node
from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers.
This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been
removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the
free list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment
handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal,
allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;),
the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer
free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using
list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node
from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers.
This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been
removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the
free list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment
handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal,
allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23326</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6r9h-pc2x-g962</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6r9h-pc2x-g962</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;),
the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer
free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using
list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node
from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers.
This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been
removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the
free list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment
handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal,
allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;),
the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer
free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using
list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node
from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers.
This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been
removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the
free list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment
handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal,
allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6r9h-pc2x-g962</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20572-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20572-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20572-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:21230-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21230-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:21230-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-23326</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23326</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;), the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below. xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers. This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the free list. Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal, allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak After commit b692bf9a7543 (&amp;#34;xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node&amp;#34;), the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below. xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using list_empty(&amp;amp;xskb-&amp;gt;list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node from the xskb pool list, it doesn&amp;#39;t reinitialize the node pointers. This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the free list. Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal, allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23326</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0861 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0861</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
