<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 02:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12156</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12156</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12156</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12156</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-23161</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23161</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23161</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347600</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347600</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347600</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347600</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-23161</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23161</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap
entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it
gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock
protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split
or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the
xa_cmpxchg_irq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause
truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the
target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large
folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the
xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and
value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t
exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem
truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration,
find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the
entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split
the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we
see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its
content er…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap
entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it
gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock
protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split
or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the
xa_cmpxchg_irq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause
truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the
target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large
folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the
xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and
value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t
exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem
truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration,
find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the
entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split
the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we
see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its
content er…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23161</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4rgv-cpg8-f3hr</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4rgv-cpg8-f3hr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap
entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it
gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock
protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split
or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the
xa_cmpxchg_irq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause
truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the
target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large
folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the
xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and
value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t
exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem
truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration,
find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the
entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split
the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we
see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its
content er…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap
entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it
gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock
protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split
or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the
xa_cmpxchg_irq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause
truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the
target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large
folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the
xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and
value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t
exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem
truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration,
find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the
entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split
the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we
see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its
content er…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4rgv-cpg8-f3hr</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2581 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2581</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: mvpp2: Prevent parser TCAM memory corruption&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Protect the parser TCAM/SRAM memory, and the cached (shadow) SRAM
information, from concurrent modifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both the TCAM and SRAM tables are indirectly accessed by configuring
an index register that selects the row to read or write to. This means
that operations must be atomic in order to, e.g., avoid spreading
writes across multiple rows. Since the shadow SRAM array is used to
find free rows in the hardware table, it must also be protected in
order to avoid TOCTOU errors where multiple cores allocate the same
row.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue was detected in a situation where `mvpp2_set_rx_mode()` ran
concurrently on two CPUs. In this particular case the
MVPP2_PE_MAC_UC_PROMISCUOUS entry was corrupted, causing the
classifier unit to drop all incoming unicast - indicated by the
`rx_classifier_drops` counter.(CVE-2025-22060)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
&amp;amp;apos;mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow&amp;amp;apos; because subflow_req-&amp;amp;gt;msk is NULL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: mvpp2: Prevent parser TCAM memory corruption&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Protect the parser TCAM/SRAM memory, and the cached (shadow) SRAM
information, from concurrent modifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both the TCAM and SRAM tables are indirectly accessed by configuring
an index register that selects the row to read or write to. This means
that operations must be atomic in order to, e.g., avoid spreading
writes across multiple rows. Since the shadow SRAM array is used to
find free rows in the hardware table, it must also be protected in
order to avoid TOCTOU errors where multiple cores allocate the same
row.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue was detected in a situation where `mvpp2_set_rx_mode()` ran
concurrently on two CPUs. In this particular case the
MVPP2_PE_MAC_UC_PROMISCUOUS entry was corrupted, causing the
classifier unit to drop all incoming unicast - indicated by the
`rx_classifier_drops` counter.(CVE-2025-22060)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
&amp;amp;apos;mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow&amp;amp;apos; because subflow_req-&amp;amp;gt;msk is NULL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2581</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20416-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20416-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20416-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:20838-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20838-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20838-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-23161</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23161</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the xa_cmpxchg_irq. And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though. To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border. Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration, find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its content erased…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 106 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/shmem, swap: fix race of truncate and swap entry split The helper for shmem swap freeing is not handling the order of swap entries correctly.  It uses xa_cmpxchg_irq to erase the swap entry, but it gets the entry order before that using xa_get_order without lock protection, and it may get an outdated order value if the entry is split or changed in other ways after the xa_get_order and before the xa_cmpxchg_irq. And besides, the order could grow and be larger than expected, and cause truncation to erase data beyond the end border.  For example, if the target entry and following entries are swapped in or freed, then a large folio was added in place and swapped out, using the same entry, the xa_cmpxchg_irq will still succeed, it&amp;#39;s very unlikely to happen though. To fix that, open code the Xarray cmpxchg and put the order retrieval and value checking in the same critical section.  Also, ensure the order won&amp;#39;t exceed the end border, skip it if the entry goes across the border. Skipping large swap entries crosses the end border is safe here.  Shmem truncate iterates the range twice, in the first iteration, find_lock_entries already filtered such entries, and shmem will swapin the entries that cross the end border and partially truncate the folio (split the folio or at least zero part of it).  So in the second loop here, if we see a swap entry that crosses the end order, it must at least have its content erased…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23161</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0421 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0421</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
