<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:34:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-12367</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12367</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-12367</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-12367</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-23066</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23066</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-23066</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0316 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0316</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0316</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0316</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347592</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347592</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347592</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347592</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-23066</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23066</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at
the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues
the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on
the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued
or because the I/O thread requeued it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to
things like UAFs or refcount underruns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and
moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we
have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call
rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the
queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at
the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues
the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on
the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued
or because the I/O thread requeued it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to
things like UAFs or refcount underruns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and
moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we
have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call
rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the
queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-23066</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-rx25-rppp-x99w</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rx25-rppp-x99w</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at
the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues
the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on
the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued
or because the I/O thread requeued it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to
things like UAFs or refcount underruns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and
moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we
have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call
rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the
queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at
the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues
the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on
the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued
or because the I/O thread requeued it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to
things like UAFs or refcount underruns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and
moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we
have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call
rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the
queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rx25-rppp-x99w</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-23066 — rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-23066</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-23066</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-23066</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20416-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20416-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20416-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:10108 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:10108</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: Bluetooth: MGMT: Fix possible UAFs kernel: mlxsw: spectrum_mr: Fix use-after-free when updating multicast route stats kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service via unsafe requeue in rxrpc_recvmsg kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service due to a deadlock in hugetlb folio migration kernel: Kernel: Privilege escalation or denial of service in nf_tables via inverted element activity check kernel: Linux kernel: Local denial of service and memory leak in DAMON sysfs via setup failure kernel: Linux kernel: Use-after-free in bonding module can cause system crash or arbitrary code execution kernel: scsi: target: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsit_dec_session_usage_count() kernel: net/sched: cls_u32: use skb_header_pointer_careful() kernel: kernel: Privilege escalation or denial of service via use-after-free in nf_tables_addchain() kernel: nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: Bluetooth: MGMT: Fix possible UAFs kernel: mlxsw: spectrum_mr: Fix use-after-free when updating multicast route stats kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service via unsafe requeue in rxrpc_recvmsg kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service due to a deadlock in hugetlb folio migration kernel: Kernel: Privilege escalation or denial of service in nf_tables via inverted element activity check kernel: Linux kernel: Local denial of service and memory leak in DAMON sysfs via setup failure kernel: Linux kernel: Use-after-free in bonding module can cause system crash or arbitrary code execution kernel: scsi: target: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsit_dec_session_usage_count() kernel: net/sched: cls_u32: use skb_header_pointer_careful() kernel: kernel: Privilege escalation or denial of service via use-after-free in nf_tables_addchain() kernel: nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:10108</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:20838-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20838-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20838-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-23066</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23066</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 225 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued or because the I/O thread requeued it. The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to things like UAFs or refcount underruns. Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it. Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 225 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix recvmsg() unconditional requeue If rxrpc_recvmsg() fails because MSG_DONTWAIT was specified but the call at the front of the recvmsg queue already has its mutex locked, it requeues the call - whether or not the call is already queued.  The call may be on the queue because MSG_PEEK was also passed and so the call was not dequeued or because the I/O thread requeued it. The unconditional requeue may then corrupt the recvmsg queue, leading to things like UAFs or refcount underruns. Fix this by only requeuing the call if it isn&amp;#39;t already on the queue - and moving it to the front if it is already queued.  If we don&amp;#39;t queue it, we have to put the ref we obtained by dequeuing it. Also, MSG_PEEK doesn&amp;#39;t dequeue the call so shouldn&amp;#39;t call rxrpc_notify_socket() for the call if we didn&amp;#39;t use up all the data on the queue, so fix that also.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-23066</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0324 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0324</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
