https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sat, 03 Oct 2026 05:20:09 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:64784 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-devel, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-libs, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-snmp, AlmaLinux:9: python3-lib389</p> <p>389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() (CVE-2026-18355) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search (CVE-2026-18453) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property (CVE-2026-18922) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN (CVE-2026-76560) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: CVE-2026-11610 incomplete fix may introduce a connection-stall DoS (CVE-2026-78701)</p> <p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p> <p>* lib389: set nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup before ensure_agreement() [almalinux-9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-244467) * fix breaks replication total init when nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup is set after agreement creation [almalinux-9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-248766)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-devel, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-libs, AlmaLinux:9: 389-ds-base-snmp, AlmaLinux:9: python3-lib389</p> <p>389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() (CVE-2026-18355) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search (CVE-2026-18453) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property (CVE-2026-18922) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN (CVE-2026-76560) * 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: CVE-2026-11610 incomplete fix may introduce a connection-stall DoS (CVE-2026-78701)</p> <p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p> <p>* lib389: set nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup before ensure_agreement() [almalinux-9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-244467) * fix breaks replication total init when nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup is set after agreement creation [almalinux-9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-248766)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:64784 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-365378 EUVD-2026-365378 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-365378 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-18355 <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-18355 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r5vv-79fp-2427 <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r5vv-79fp-2427 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:64771 <p>389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN</p> <p>389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:64771 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:64783 <p>389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN</p> <p>389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:64783 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:64784 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Rocky Linux:9: 389-ds-base</p> <p>389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() (CVE-2026-18355)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search (CVE-2026-18453)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property (CVE-2026-18922)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN (CVE-2026-76560)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: CVE-2026-11610 incomplete fix may introduce a connection-stall DoS (CVE-2026-78701)</p> <p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p> <p>* lib389: set nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup before ensure_agreement() [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-244467)</p> <p>* fix breaks replication total init when nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup is set after agreement creation [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-248766)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Rocky Linux:9: 389-ds-base</p> <p>389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration.</p> <p>Security Fix(es):</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: heap buffer overflow via SASL wrapped-record length lower-bound underflow in sasl_io_start_packet() (CVE-2026-18355)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search (CVE-2026-18453)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: SASL PLAIN authentication allows privilege escalation to Directory Manager via stale identity in Cyrus SASL auxiliary property (CVE-2026-18922)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds: anonymous LDAP client can defeat SELFDN ACI bind-rule checks via empty bind DN (CVE-2026-76560)</p> <p>* 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: CVE-2026-11610 incomplete fix may introduce a connection-stall DoS (CVE-2026-78701)</p> <p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p> <p>* lib389: set nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup before ensure_agreement() [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-244467)</p> <p>* fix breaks replication total init when nsDS5ReplicaBindDNGroup is set after agreement creation [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-248766)</p> <p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:64784 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-18355 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: 389-ds-base</p> <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: 389-ds-base, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: 389-ds-base</p> <p>A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF &gt; 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-18355 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3215 <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Directory Server und Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Administratorrechte zu erlangen, Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.</p> <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Directory Server und Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Administratorrechte zu erlangen, Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3215