<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-12886</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12886</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-12886</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12886</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-9231</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-9231</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-9231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0835 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécutio…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0835</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0835</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0835</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-336301</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-336301</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-336301</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-336301</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-9231</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-9231</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-9231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote
recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit
ARM platforms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit
ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter,
timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so
this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is
possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled
with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be
recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate
severity issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-043-06 — Siemens SINEC OS</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-043-06</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35. In the environment of Internet of Vehicles, this vulnerability can be executed from command to arbitrary code execution. In affected libpcap versions during the setup of a remote packet capture the internal function sock_initaddress() calls getaddrinfo() and possibly freeaddrinfo(), but does not clearly indicate to the caller function whether freeaddrinfo() still remains to be called after the function returns.  This makes it possible in some scenarios that both the function and its caller call freeaddrinfo() for the same allocated memory block.  A similar problem was reported in Apple libpcap, to which Apple assigned CVE-2023-40400. An issue in the CPIO command of Busybox v1.33.2 allows attackers to execute a directory traversal. A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in xasprintf function in xfuncs_printf.c:344 in BusyBox v.1.36.1. A use-after-free vulnerability in BusyBox v.1.36.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted awk pattern in the awk.c evaluate function. A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in BusyBox v.1.36.1 via a crafted awk pattern in the awk.c copyvar function. A heap-buffer-overflow was discovered in BusyBox v.1.36.1 in the next_token function at awk.c:1159. libcurl&amp;#39;s ASN1 parser has this utf8asn1str() function used for parsing an ASN.1 UTF-8 string. Itcan detect an invalid field and return error. Unfortunately, when doing so it also invokes `fr…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35. In the environment of Internet of Vehicles, this vulnerability can be executed from command to arbitrary code execution. In affected libpcap versions during the setup of a remote packet capture the internal function sock_initaddress() calls getaddrinfo() and possibly freeaddrinfo(), but does not clearly indicate to the caller function whether freeaddrinfo() still remains to be called after the function returns.  This makes it possible in some scenarios that both the function and its caller call freeaddrinfo() for the same allocated memory block.  A similar problem was reported in Apple libpcap, to which Apple assigned CVE-2023-40400. An issue in the CPIO command of Busybox v1.33.2 allows attackers to execute a directory traversal. A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in xasprintf function in xfuncs_printf.c:344 in BusyBox v.1.36.1. A use-after-free vulnerability in BusyBox v.1.36.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted awk pattern in the awk.c evaluate function. A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in BusyBox v.1.36.1 via a crafted awk pattern in the awk.c copyvar function. A heap-buffer-overflow was discovered in BusyBox v.1.36.1 in the next_token function at awk.c:1159. libcurl&amp;#39;s ASN1 parser has this utf8asn1str() function used for parsing an ASN.1 UTF-8 string. Itcan detect an invalid field and return error. Unfortunately, when doing so it also invokes `fr…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-043-06</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-9231 — Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-9231</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-9231</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-9231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:15723-1 — regclient-0.10.0-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:15723-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;regclient-0.10.0-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;regclient-0.10.0-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:15723-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:7261 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:7261</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;openssl: Out-of-bounds read &amp;amp; write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap openssl: Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM openssl: Out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service through crafted PKCS#12 file openssl: OpenSSL: Remote code execution or Denial of Service via oversized Initialization Vector in CMS parsing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via NULL pointer dereference in QUIC protocol handling openssl: OpenSSL: Data integrity bypass in `openssl dgst` command due to silent truncation openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to excessive memory allocation in TLS 1.3 certificate compression openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds write in BIO filter openssl: OpenSSL: Information disclosure and data tampering via specific low-level OCB encryption/decryption calls openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution due to out-of-bounds write in PKCS#12 processing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed TimeStamp Response openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed PKCS#12 file processing openssl: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to type confusion in PKCS#12 file processing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via type confusion in PKCS#7 signature verification openssl: openssl: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds read in AES-CFB128 openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution due to use-after-free in DANE TLS…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;openssl: Out-of-bounds read &amp;amp; write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap openssl: Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM openssl: Out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service through crafted PKCS#12 file openssl: OpenSSL: Remote code execution or Denial of Service via oversized Initialization Vector in CMS parsing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via NULL pointer dereference in QUIC protocol handling openssl: OpenSSL: Data integrity bypass in `openssl dgst` command due to silent truncation openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to excessive memory allocation in TLS 1.3 certificate compression openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds write in BIO filter openssl: OpenSSL: Information disclosure and data tampering via specific low-level OCB encryption/decryption calls openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution due to out-of-bounds write in PKCS#12 processing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed TimeStamp Response openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via malformed PKCS#12 file processing openssl: OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to type confusion in PKCS#12 file processing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via type confusion in PKCS#7 signature verification openssl: openssl: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds read in AES-CFB128 openssl: OpenSSL: Arbitrary code execution due to use-after-free in DANE TLS…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:7261</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:21213-1 — Security update for openssl-3</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21213-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21213-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-9231</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-9231</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts.  However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-9231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2166 — OpenSSL und LibreSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2166</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL und LibreSSL ausnutzen, um potentiell beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial of Service-Zustand zu verursachen und vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL und LibreSSL ausnutzen, um potentiell beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial of Service-Zustand zu verursachen und vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
