<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-04133</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04133</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-04133</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04133</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-71181</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-71181</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-71181</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-315230</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315230</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-315230</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315230</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-71181</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-71181</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit
fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into
account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback
when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes
like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO
	--------------------------------------------
	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
	       ----
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3 locks held by kswapd0/68:
	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160
	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20
	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit
fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into
account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback
when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes
like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO
	--------------------------------------------
	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
	       ----
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3 locks held by kswapd0/68:
	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160
	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20
	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-71181</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3qhg-rc86-rh99</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3qhg-rc86-rh99</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit
fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into
account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback
when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes
like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO
	--------------------------------------------
	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
	       ----
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3 locks held by kswapd0/68:
	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160
	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20
	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit
fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into
account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback
when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes
like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO
	--------------------------------------------
	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
	 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
	       ----
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);
	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3 locks held by kswapd0/68:
	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160
	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20
	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3qhg-rc86-rh99</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-71181</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-71181</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 81 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page() When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes like the following: 	============================================ 	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO 	-------------------------------------------- 	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock: 	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230 	but task is already holding lock: 	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20 	other info that might help us debug this: 	 Possible unsafe locking scenario: 	       CPU0 	       ---- 	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock); 	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock); 	 *** DEADLOCK *** 	 May be due to missing lock nesting notation 	3 locks held by kswapd0/68: 	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160 	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20 	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230 To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 81 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page() When forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit fb56fdf8b9a2 (&amp;#34;mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope&amp;#34;) into account, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback when I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes like the following: 	============================================ 	WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 	6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO 	-------------------------------------------- 	kswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock: 	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230 	but task is already holding lock: 	ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20 	other info that might help us debug this: 	 Possible unsafe locking scenario: 	       CPU0 	       ---- 	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock); 	  lock(&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock); 	 *** DEADLOCK *** 	 May be due to missing lock nesting notation 	3 locks held by kswapd0/68: 	 #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160 	 #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&amp;amp;l-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20 	 #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230 To fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-71181</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0280 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0280</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
