<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 04:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-00737</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-00737</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-00737</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-00737</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-68775</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68775</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68775</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0166 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0166</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0166</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0166</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347515</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347515</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347515</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347515</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-68775</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68775</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the
handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the
handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,
then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming
HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue
processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on
the sock and a refcount underflow occurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if
the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t
follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the
timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers
a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is
hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via
xs_tls_handshake_sync().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel
path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the
handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the
handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,
then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming
HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue
processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on
the sock and a refcount underflow occurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if
the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t
follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the
timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers
a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is
hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via
xs_tls_handshake_sync().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel
path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68775</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jpgq-r68h-x9q2</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jpgq-r68h-x9q2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the
handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the
handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,
then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming
HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue
processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on
the sock and a refcount underflow occurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if
the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t
follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the
timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers
a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is
hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via
xs_tls_handshake_sync().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel
path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the
handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the
handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,
then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming
HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue
processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on
the sock and a refcount underflow occurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if
the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t
follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the
timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers
a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is
hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via
xs_tls_handshake_sync().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel
path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jpgq-r68h-x9q2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-68775 — net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68775</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-68775</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68775</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20287-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20287-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:0471-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0471-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0471-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68775</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68775</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 140 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed. If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request, then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on the sock and a refcount underflow occurs. This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via xs_tls_handshake_sync(). Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 140 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the handshake_net-&amp;gt;hn_requests list, but it is still present in the handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed. If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request, then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn&amp;#39;t set in req-&amp;gt;hr_flags, we&amp;#39;ll continue processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on the sock and a refcount underflow occurs. This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn&amp;#39;t follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd.  When the timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport().  When the timeout is hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via xs_tls_handshake_sync(). Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel path so duplicate cancels can be detected.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68775</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-0086 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0086</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-0086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
