<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 11:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-01151</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01151</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-01151</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01151</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-68740</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68740</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68740</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0108 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0108</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0108</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0108</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-327800</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327800</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-327800</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-327800</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-68740</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68740</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check
and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp;
!rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:
  selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
  security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
  ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
  ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
  ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
  process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
  ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
  security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
  search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
  exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
  bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
  do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
  __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
  do_el0_svc+0x24/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check
and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp;
!rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:
  selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
  security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
  ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
  ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
  ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
  process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
  ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
  security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
  search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
  exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
  bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
  do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
  __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
  do_el0_svc+0x24/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68740</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-c6v5-xpx3-j3vp</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-c6v5-xpx3-j3vp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check
and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp;
!rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:
  selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
  security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
  ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
  ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
  ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
  process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
  ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
  security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
  search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
  exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
  bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
  do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
  __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
  do_el0_svc+0x24/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check
and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp;
!rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call trace:
  selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
  security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
  ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
  ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
  ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
  process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
  ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
  security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
  search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
  exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
  bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
  do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
  __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
  do_el0_svc+0x24/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-c6v5-xpx3-j3vp</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-68740 — ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68740</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-68740</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68740</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2417 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2417</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:mm/mempolicy: fix migrate_to_node() assuming there is at least one VMA in a MMWe currently assume that there is at least one VMA in a MM, which isn ttrue.So we might end up having find_vma() return NULL, to then de-referenceNULL.  So properly handle find_vma() returning NULL.This fixes the report:Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTIKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6021 Comm: syz-executor284 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00187-gf868cd251776 #0Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024RIP: 0010:migrate_to_node mm/mempolicy.c:1090 [inline]RIP: 0010:do_migrate_pages+0x403/0x6f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1194Code: ...RSP: 0018:ffffc9000375fd08 EFLAGS: 00010246RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000375fd78 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: ffff88807e171300 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff88803390c044RBP: ffff88807e171428 R08: 0000000000000014 R09: fffffbfff2039ef1R10: ffffffff901cf78f R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003R13: ffffc9000375fe90 R14: ffffc9000375fe98 R15: ffffc9000375fdf8FS:  00005555919e1380(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 00005555919e1ca8 CR3: 000000007f12a000 CR4: 00000000003526f0DR0…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:mm/mempolicy: fix migrate_to_node() assuming there is at least one VMA in a MMWe currently assume that there is at least one VMA in a MM, which isn ttrue.So we might end up having find_vma() return NULL, to then de-referenceNULL.  So properly handle find_vma() returning NULL.This fixes the report:Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTIKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6021 Comm: syz-executor284 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00187-gf868cd251776 #0Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024RIP: 0010:migrate_to_node mm/mempolicy.c:1090 [inline]RIP: 0010:do_migrate_pages+0x403/0x6f0 mm/mempolicy.c:1194Code: ...RSP: 0018:ffffc9000375fd08 EFLAGS: 00010246RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000375fd78 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: ffff88807e171300 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff88803390c044RBP: ffff88807e171428 R08: 0000000000000014 R09: fffffbfff2039ef1R10: ffffffff901cf78f R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003R13: ffffc9000375fe90 R14: ffffc9000375fe98 R15: ffffc9000375fdf8FS:  00005555919e1380(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 00005555919e1ca8 CR3: 000000007f12a000 CR4: 00000000003526f0DR0…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2417</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10039-1 — kernel-devel-6.18.5-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10039-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-6.18.5-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-6.18.5-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10039-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:0278-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0278-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0278-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68740</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68740</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 231 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match() In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing extra files to be measured by IMA. This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario: After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated, in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match. Call trace:   selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8   security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0   ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0   ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8   ima_get_action+0x48/0x60   process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98   ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8   security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78   search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318   exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8   bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130   do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258   __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68   invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0   do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 231 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match() In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and sets &amp;#39;result = true&amp;#39;. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing extra files to be measured by IMA. This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario: After unloading the SELinux policy module via &amp;#39;semodule -d&amp;#39;, if an IMA measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated, in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the &amp;#39;if (rc == -ESTALE &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !rule_reinitialized)&amp;#39; block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT. This bypasses the &amp;#39;if (!rc)&amp;#39; check and results in a false match. Call trace:   selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8   security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0   ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0   ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8   ima_get_action+0x48/0x60   process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98   ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8   security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78   search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318   exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8   bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130   do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258   __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68   invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0   do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68740</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2929 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2929</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
