<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:17:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-10525</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10525</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-10525</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10525</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-68245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0057 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Elles permettent à un attaquant de p…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0057</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0057</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0057</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-315075</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315075</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-315075</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-315075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-68245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is
   allocated, and refcnt = 1
   - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
     this case, there is just one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
   npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.
   - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;
   - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
   - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring
     refcnt.
     - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`
   - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
   - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Now the second target tries to clean up
   - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.
     * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
       the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
       instance)
  - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
    kmemleak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds
clarifying comm…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is
   allocated, and refcnt = 1
   - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
     this case, there is just one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
   npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.
   - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;
   - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
   - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring
     refcnt.
     - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`
   - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
   - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Now the second target tries to clean up
   - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.
     * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
       the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
       instance)
  - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
    kmemleak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds
clarifying comm…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jr3x-g84v-9793</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jr3x-g84v-9793</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is
   allocated, and refcnt = 1
   - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
     this case, there is just one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
   npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.
   - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;
   - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
   - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring
     refcnt.
     - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`
   - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
   - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Now the second target tries to clean up
   - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.
     * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
       the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
       instance)
  - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
    kmemleak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds
clarifying comm…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly
ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during
netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is
   allocated, and refcnt = 1
   - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In
     this case, there is just one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and
   npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.
   - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;
   - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:
   - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring
     refcnt.
     - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`
   - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup
   - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Now the second target tries to clean up
   - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.
     * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and
       the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll
       instance)
  - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by
    kmemleak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds
clarifying comm…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jr3x-g84v-9793</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-1303 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1303</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ptr_ring: do not block hard interrupts in ptr_ring_resize_multiple()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jakub added a lockdep_assert_no_hardirq() check in __page_pool_put_page()
to increase test coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot found a splat caused by hard irq blocking in
ptr_ring_resize_multiple() [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As current users of ptr_ring_resize_multiple() do not require
hard irqs being masked, replace it to only block BH.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rename helpers to better reflect they are safe against BH only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- ptr_ring_resize_multiple() to ptr_ring_resize_multiple_bh()
- skb_array_resize_multiple() to skb_array_resize_multiple_bh()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9150 at net/core/page_pool.c:709 __page_pool_put_page net/core/page_pool.c:709 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9150 at net/core/page_pool.c:709 page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem+0x157/0xa40 net/core/page_pool.c:780
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 9150 Comm: syz.1.1052 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00202-gf8669d7b5f5d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024
RIP: 0010:__page_pool_put_page net/core/page_pool.c:709 [inline]
RIP: 0010:page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem+0x157/0xa40 net/core/page_pool.c:780
Code: 74 0e e8 7c aa fb f7 eb 43 e8 75 aa fb f7 eb 3c 65 8b 1d 38 a8 6a 76 31 ff 89 de e8 a3 ae fb f7 85 db 74 0b e8 5a aa fb f7 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt; 0b 90 eb 1d 65 8b 1d 15 a8 6a 76 31 ff 89 de e8 84 ae fb f7 85
RSP:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ptr_ring: do not block hard interrupts in ptr_ring_resize_multiple()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jakub added a lockdep_assert_no_hardirq() check in __page_pool_put_page()
to increase test coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot found a splat caused by hard irq blocking in
ptr_ring_resize_multiple() [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As current users of ptr_ring_resize_multiple() do not require
hard irqs being masked, replace it to only block BH.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rename helpers to better reflect they are safe against BH only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- ptr_ring_resize_multiple() to ptr_ring_resize_multiple_bh()
- skb_array_resize_multiple() to skb_array_resize_multiple_bh()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9150 at net/core/page_pool.c:709 __page_pool_put_page net/core/page_pool.c:709 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9150 at net/core/page_pool.c:709 page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem+0x157/0xa40 net/core/page_pool.c:780
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 9150 Comm: syz.1.1052 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00202-gf8669d7b5f5d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024
RIP: 0010:__page_pool_put_page net/core/page_pool.c:709 [inline]
RIP: 0010:page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem+0x157/0xa40 net/core/page_pool.c:780
Code: 74 0e e8 7c aa fb f7 eb 43 e8 75 aa fb f7 eb 3c 65 8b 1d 38 a8 6a 76 31 ff 89 de e8 a3 ae fb f7 85 db 74 0b e8 5a aa fb f7 90 &amp;amp;lt;0f&amp;amp;gt; 0b 90 eb 1d 65 8b 1d 15 a8 6a 76 31 ff 89 de e8 84 ae fb f7 85
RSP:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1303</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:20287-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20287-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:20287-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:0473-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0473-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0473-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68245</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68245</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 227 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks. Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup: 1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is    allocated, and refcnt = 1    - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In      this case, there is just one. 2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and    npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.    - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;    - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev. 3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:    - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring      refcnt.      - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`    - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup    - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called 4) Now the second target tries to clean up    - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.      * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and        the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll        instance)   - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by     kmemleak. Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds clarifying comments emp…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 227 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) incorrectly ignored the refcount and prematurely set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo to NULL during netpoll cleanup, leading to improper behavior and memory leaks. Scenario causing lack of proper cleanup: 1) A netpoll is associated with a NIC (e.g., eth0) and netdev-&amp;gt;npinfo is    allocated, and refcnt = 1    - Keep in mind that npinfo is shared among all netpoll instances. In      this case, there is just one. 2) Another netpoll is also associated with the same NIC and    npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt += 1.    - Now dev-&amp;gt;npinfo-&amp;gt;refcnt = 2;    - There is just one npinfo associated to the netdev. 3) When the first netpolls goes to clean up:    - The first cleanup succeeds and clears np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, ignoring      refcnt.      - It basically calls `RCU_INIT_POINTER(np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo, NULL);`    - Set dev-&amp;gt;npinfo = NULL, without proper cleanup    - No -&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() is either called 4) Now the second target tries to clean up    - The second cleanup fails because np-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;npinfo is already NULL.      * In this case, ops-&amp;gt;ndo_netpoll_cleanup() was never called, and        the skb pool is not cleaned as well (for the second netpoll        instance)   - This leaks npinfo and skbpool skbs, which is clearly reported by     kmemleak. Revert commit efa95b01da18 (&amp;#34;netpoll: fix use after free&amp;#34;) and adds clarifying comments emp…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68245</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2868 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2868</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
