<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-263639</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-263639</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-263639</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-263639</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-65431</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-65431</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-65431</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-8m3c-c723-h4p4 — django-allauth's Okta and NetIQ implementations used a mutable identifier for authorization decisions</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8m3c-c723-h4p4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8m3c-c723-h4p4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10680-1 — python311-django-allauth-65.16.1-2.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10680-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;python311-django-allauth-65.16.1-2.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;python311-django-allauth-65.16.1-2.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10680-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2025-111</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2025-111</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2025-111</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-65431</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-65431</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:25.10: django-allauth, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: django-allauth, Ubuntu:25.10: django-allauth, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: django-allauth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-65431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
