<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-12715</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12715</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-12715</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12715</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0281 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Splunk. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaq…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0281</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0281</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0281</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-254219</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-254219</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-254219</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-254219</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-59729</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-59729</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-59729</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-j8h4-v947-5h7q</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j8h4-v947-5h7q</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j8h4-v947-5h7q</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-59729</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-59729</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: libav&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer. If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000. The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer. There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation. We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: libav&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When parsing the header for a DHAV file, there&amp;#39;s an integer underflow in offset calculation that leads to reading the duration from before the start of the allocated buffer. If we load a DHAV file that is larger than MAX_DURATION_BUFFER_SIZE bytes (0x100000) for example 0x101000 bytes, then at [0] we have size = 0x101000. At [1] we have end_buffer_size = 0x100000, and at [2] we have end_buffer_pos = 0x1000. The loop then scans backwards through the buffer looking for the dhav tag; when it is found, we&amp;#39;ll calculate end_pos based on a 32-bit offset read from the buffer. There is subsequently a check [3] that end_pos is within the section of the file that has been copied into end_buffer, but it only correctly handles the cases where end_pos is before the start of the file or after the section copied into end_buffer, and not the case where end_pos is within the the file, but before the section copied into end_buffer. If we provide such an offset, (end_pos - end_buffer_pos) can underflow, resulting in the subsequent access at [4] occurring before the beginning of the allocation. We recommend upgrading to version 8.0 or beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-59729</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2130 — ffmpeg: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2130</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in ffmpeg ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in ffmpeg ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
