<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>ALSA-2025:21139 — Important: python-kdcproxy security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2025:21139</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:9: python3-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python is an interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language, which includes modules, classes, exceptions, very high level dynamic data types and dynamic typing. Python supports interfaces to many system calls and libraries, as well as to various windowing systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm?Controlled DNS SRV (CVE-2025-59088)
  * python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering (CVE-2025-59089)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:9: python3-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python is an interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language, which includes modules, classes, exceptions, very high level dynamic data types and dynamic typing. Python supports interfaces to many system calls and libraries, as well as to various windowing systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm?Controlled DNS SRV (CVE-2025-59088)
  * python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering (CVE-2025-59089)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2025:21139</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-03386</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03386</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-03386</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03386</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-331270</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-331270</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-331270</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-331270</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-59089</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-59089</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new
buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response
header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new
buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response
header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-59089</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-hxcg-77v3-qx52</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hxcg-77v3-qx52</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new
buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response
header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new
buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response
header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hxcg-77v3-qx52</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2720 — python-kdcproxy security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2720</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP2: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: python-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This package contains a Python WSGI module for proxying KDC requests over HTTP by following the MS-KKDCP protocol. It aims to be simple to deploy, with minimal configuration.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where
the &amp;amp;quot;use_dns&amp;amp;quot; setting is explicitly set to false are not affected.(CVE-2025-59088)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;amp;apos;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicate…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP2: python-kdcproxy, openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: python-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This package contains a Python WSGI module for proxying KDC requests over HTTP by following the MS-KKDCP protocol. It aims to be simple to deploy, with minimal configuration.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where
the &amp;amp;quot;use_dns&amp;amp;quot; setting is explicitly set to false are not affected.(CVE-2025-59088)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;amp;apos;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicate…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2720</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:21138 — Red Hat Security Advisory: python-kdcproxy security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:21138</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm‑Controlled DNS SRV python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm‑Controlled DNS SRV python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:21138</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:21140 — Red Hat Security Advisory: idm:DL1 security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:21140</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm‑Controlled DNS SRV python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;python-kdcproxy: Unauthenticated SSRF via Realm‑Controlled DNS SRV python-kdcproxy: Remote DoS via unbounded TCP upstream buffering&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:21140</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-59089</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-59089</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:25.10: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:25.10: python-kdcproxy, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-kdcproxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC&amp;#39;s response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-59089</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2586 — Red Hat Enterprise Linux (python-kdcproxy): Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2586</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen und um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen und um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
