https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:40:53 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-14579 bdu:2025-14579 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-14579 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-40194 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-40194 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1048 certfr-2025-avi-1048 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1048 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314955 EUVD-2026-314955 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314955 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-40194 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request()</p> <p>The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it.</p> <p>Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless).</p> <p>Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request()</p> <p>The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it.</p> <p>Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless).</p> <p>Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-40194 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8qw2-hj59-c25x <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request()</p> <p>The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it.</p> <p>Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless).</p> <p>Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request()</p> <p>The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it.</p> <p>Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless).</p> <p>Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8qw2-hj59-c25x https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-40194 msrc_CVE-2025-40194 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-40194 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2764 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()There s issue as follows:BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()There s issue as follows:BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2764 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20172-1 <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20172-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:4422-1 <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:4422-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-40194 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 201 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request() The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it. Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless). Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 201 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request() The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it. Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless). Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-40194 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2595 <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.</p> <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2595