<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-02769</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02769</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-02769</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02769</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39988</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39988</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39988</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1009 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoqu…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1009</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347294</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347294</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347294</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347294</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-39988</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39988</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to
directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check
which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that
skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its
net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to
configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$ ip link set can0 mtu 9999&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the
ETH_P_CANXL protocol:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct canxl_frame frame = {
		.flags = 0xff,
		.len = 2048,
	};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to
check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the
malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the
     function does not check the actual device capabilities).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. the length is a valid CAN XL length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not
able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD)
frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4
variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_t…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to
directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check
which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that
skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its
net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to
configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$ ip link set can0 mtu 9999&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the
ETH_P_CANXL protocol:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct canxl_frame frame = {
		.flags = 0xff,
		.len = 2048,
	};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to
check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the
malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the
     function does not check the actual device capabilities).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. the length is a valid CAN XL length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not
able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD)
frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4
variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_t…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39988</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5q82-r42m-g49m</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5q82-r42m-g49m</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to
directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check
which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that
skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its
net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to
configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$ ip link set can0 mtu 9999&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the
ETH_P_CANXL protocol:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct canxl_frame frame = {
		.flags = 0xff,
		.len = 2048,
	};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to
check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the
malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the
     function does not check the actual device capabilities).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. the length is a valid CAN XL length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not
able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD)
frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4
variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_t…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to
directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check
which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that
skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its
net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to
configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$ ip link set can0 mtu 9999&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the
ETH_P_CANXL protocol:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL));&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;struct canxl_frame frame = {
		.flags = 0xff,
		.len = 2048,
	};&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to
check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the
malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the
     function does not check the actual device capabilities).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. the length is a valid CAN XL length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not
able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD)
frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4
variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_t…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5q82-r42m-g49m</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-39988 — can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39988</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-39988</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39988</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20091-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20091-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20091-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:21040-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39988</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39988</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 169 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU. Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:   $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: 	socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)); to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example: 	struct canxl_frame frame = { 		.flags = 0xff, 		.len = 2048, 	}; The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:   1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the      function does not check the actual device capabilities).   2. the length is a valid CAN XL length. And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD) frame. This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4 variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_tx_can_msg(),…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 169 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: populate ndo_change_mtu() to prevent buffer overflow Sending an PF_PACKET allows to bypass the CAN framework logic and to directly reach the xmit() function of a CAN driver. The only check which is performed by the PF_PACKET framework is to make sure that skb-&amp;gt;len fits the interface&amp;#39;s MTU. Unfortunately, because the etas_es58x driver does not populate its net_device_ops-&amp;gt;ndo_change_mtu(), it is possible for an attacker to configure an invalid MTU by doing, for example:   $ ip link set can0 mtu 9999 After doing so, the attacker could open a PF_PACKET socket using the ETH_P_CANXL protocol: 	socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_CANXL)); to inject a malicious CAN XL frames. For example: 	struct canxl_frame frame = { 		.flags = 0xff, 		.len = 2048, 	}; The CAN drivers&amp;#39; xmit() function are calling can_dev_dropped_skb() to check that the skb is valid, unfortunately under above conditions, the malicious packet is able to go through can_dev_dropped_skb() checks:   1. the skb-&amp;gt;protocol is set to ETH_P_CANXL which is valid (the      function does not check the actual device capabilities).   2. the length is a valid CAN XL length. And so, es58x_start_xmit() receives a CAN XL frame which it is not able to correctly handle and will thus misinterpret it as a CAN(FD) frame. This can result in a buffer overflow. For example, using the es581.4 variant, the frame will be dispatched to es581_4_tx_can_msg(),…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39988</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2298 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2298</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Daten zu manipulieren und andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Daten zu manipulieren und andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
