https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sat, 03 Oct 2026 17:20:43 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02675 bdu:2026-02675 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02675 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39945 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39945 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0899 certfr-2025-avi-0899 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0899 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347264 EUVD-2026-347264 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347264 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39945 <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task</p> <p>The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task().</p> <p>A typical race condition is illustrated below:</p> <p>CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use</p> <p>Replace cancel_delayed_work()…</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task</p> <p>The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task().</p> <p>A typical race condition is illustrated below:</p> <p>CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use</p> <p>Replace cancel_delayed_work()…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39945 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g7c3-fwjq-9g8f <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task</p> <p>The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task().</p> <p>A typical race condition is illustrated below:</p> <p>CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use</p> <p>Replace cancel_delayed_work()…</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p> <p>cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task</p> <p>The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task().</p> <p>A typical race condition is illustrated below:</p> <p>CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use</p> <p>Replace cancel_delayed_work()…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g7c3-fwjq-9g8f https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39945 msrc_CVE-2025-39945 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39945 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2633 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems with CPU-less NUMA nodesCurrently, load_microcode_amd() iterates over all NUMA nodes, retrieves theirCPU masks and unconditionally accesses per-CPU data for the first CPU of eachmask.According to Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst: Some memory may share the same node as a CPU, and others are provided as memory only nodes. Therefore, some node CPU masks may be empty and wouldn t have a first CPU .On a machine with far memory (and therefore CPU-less NUMA nodes):- cpumask_of_node(nid) is 0- cpumask_first(0) is CONFIG_NR_CPUS- cpu_data(CONFIG_NR_CPUS) accesses the cpu_info per-CPU array at an index that is 1 out of boundsThis does not have any security implications since flashing microcode isa privileged operation but I believe this has reliability implications bypotentially corrupting memory while flashing a microcode update.When booting with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y on an AMD machine that flashesa microcode update. I get the following splat: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:X:Y index 512 is out of range for type unsigned long[512] [...] Call Trace: dump_stack __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds load_microcode_amd request_microcode_amd reload_store kernfs_fop_write_iter vfs_write ksys_write do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p> <p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:x86/microcode/AMD: Fix out-of-bounds on systems with CPU-less NUMA nodesCurrently, load_microcode_amd() iterates over all NUMA nodes, retrieves theirCPU masks and unconditionally accesses per-CPU data for the first CPU of eachmask.According to Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst: Some memory may share the same node as a CPU, and others are provided as memory only nodes. Therefore, some node CPU masks may be empty and wouldn t have a first CPU .On a machine with far memory (and therefore CPU-less NUMA nodes):- cpumask_of_node(nid) is 0- cpumask_first(0) is CONFIG_NR_CPUS- cpu_data(CONFIG_NR_CPUS) accesses the cpu_info per-CPU array at an index that is 1 out of boundsThis does not have any security implications since flashing microcode isa privileged operation but I believe this has reliability implications bypotentially corrupting memory while flashing a microcode update.When booting with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y on an AMD machine that flashesa microcode update. I get the following splat: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:X:Y index 512 is out of range for type unsigned long[512] [...] Call Trace: dump_stack __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds load_microcode_amd request_microcode_amd reload_store kernfs_fop_write_iter vfs_write ksys_write do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2633 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1 <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1 <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39945 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task(). A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use Replace cancel_delayed_work() with…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more</p> <p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cnic: Fix use-after-free bugs in cnic_delete_task The original code uses cancel_delayed_work() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw(), which does not guarantee that the delayed work item &#39;delete_task&#39; has fully completed if it was already running. Additionally, the delayed work item is cyclic, the flush_workqueue() in cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() only blocks and waits for work items that were already queued to the workqueue prior to its invocation. Any work items submitted after flush_workqueue() is called are not included in the set of tasks that the flush operation awaits. This means that after the cyclic work items have finished executing, a delayed work item may still exist in the workqueue. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where the cnic_dev is deallocated by cnic_free_dev(), while delete_task remains active and attempt to dereference cnic_dev in cnic_delete_task(). A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) cnic_netdev_event() | cnic_stop_hw() | cnic_delete_task() cnic_cm_stop_bnx2x_hw() | ... cancel_delayed_work() | /* the queue_delayed_work() flush_workqueue() | executes after flush_workqueue()*/ | queue_delayed_work() cnic_free_dev(dev)//free | cnic_delete_task() //new instance | dev = cp-&gt;dev; //use Replace cancel_delayed_work() with…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39945 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2194 <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p> <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2194