<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 08:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15212</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15212</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15212</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15212</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0825</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-317155</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317155</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-317155</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317155</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-39759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-f7p4-h976-ch7q</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-f7p4-h976-ch7q</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-f7p4-h976-ch7q</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-39759 — btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39759</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-39759</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-2674 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;amp;apos;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;amp;apos;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;amp;apos;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.(CVE-2025-39759)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: wilc1000: avoid buffer overflow in WID string configuration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the following copy overflow warning identi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;amp;apos;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This happens as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;amp;apos;t set yet by
   task A);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;amp;apos;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.(CVE-2025-39759)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: wilc1000: avoid buffer overflow in WID string configuration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix the following copy overflow warning identi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:03600-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 216 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree. This happens as follows: 1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan(); 2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls    btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that    point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by    task A); 3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups    from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock; 4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating    the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,    but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding    the lock, resulting in a use-after-free. Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config(). Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 216 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl There&amp;#39;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree. This happens as follows: 1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan(); 2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls    btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that    point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;#39;t set yet by    task A); 3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups    from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock; 4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating    the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,    but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding    the lock, resulting in a use-after-free. Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config(). Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;#39;t start the rescan worker if quotas were already disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2040 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2040</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, sowie einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, sowie einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
