<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15767</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15767</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15767</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15767</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38677</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38677</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38677</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0825</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-347145</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347145</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-347145</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347145</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-38677</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38677</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Jiaming Zhang reported:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480
 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593
 data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]
 f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]
 f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855
 f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195
 prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]
 f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594
 generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112
 f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]
 f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216
 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
 vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686
 ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same
node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to
access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode
as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to
access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 byt…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Jiaming Zhang reported:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480
 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593
 data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]
 f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]
 f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855
 f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195
 prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]
 f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594
 generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112
 f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]
 f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216
 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
 vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686
 ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same
node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to
access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode
as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to
access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 byt…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38677</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-p7jq-2wv5-rrmc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p7jq-2wv5-rrmc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Jiaming Zhang reported:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480
 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593
 data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]
 f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]
 f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855
 f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195
 prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]
 f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594
 generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112
 f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]
 f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216
 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
 vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686
 ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same
node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to
access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode
as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to
access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 byt…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Jiaming Zhang reported:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480
 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593
 data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]
 f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]
 f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855
 f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195
 prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]
 f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594
 generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112
 f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]
 f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216
 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
 vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686
 ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same
node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to
access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode
as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to
access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 byt…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p7jq-2wv5-rrmc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-38677 — f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38677</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-38677</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38677</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38677</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38677</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page As Jiaming Zhang reported:  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]  dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120  print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]  print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480  kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593  data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]  f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]  f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855  f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195  prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]  f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594  generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112  f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]  f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]  vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686  ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 bytes.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page As Jiaming Zhang reported:  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]  dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120  print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]  print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480  kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593  data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]  f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]  f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855  f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195  prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]  f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594  generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112  f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]  f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]  vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686  ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 bytes.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38677</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1933 — Linux Kernel: Eine Schwachstelle ermöglicht einen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1933</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
