<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-10744</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10744</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-10744</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10744</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38334</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38334</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38334</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0698 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0698</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-314547</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314547</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-314547</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314547</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-38334</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38334</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The longer story:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in
arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until
sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other
conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was
poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added
to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down
and the kernel to panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which
accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX
memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than
by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting
both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the
remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from
sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The longer story:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in
arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until
sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other
conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was
poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added
to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down
and the kernel to panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which
accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX
memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than
by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting
both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the
remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from
sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38334</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-chrh-m3h6-4898</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-chrh-m3h6-4898</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The longer story:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in
arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until
sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other
conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was
poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added
to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down
and the kernel to panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which
accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX
memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than
by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting
both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the
remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from
sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The longer story:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in
arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until
sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other
conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was
poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added
to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down
and the kernel to panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which
accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX
memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than
by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting
both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the
remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from
sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-chrh-m3h6-4898</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-38334 — x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38334</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-38334</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38334</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2268 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2268</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rapidio: fix an API misues when rio_add_net() fails&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rio_add_net() calls device_register() and fails when device_register()
fails.  Thus, put_device() should be used rather than kfree().  Add
&amp;amp;quot;mport-&amp;amp;gt;net = NULL;&amp;amp;quot; to avoid a use after free issue.(CVE-2025-21934)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs: Fix integer overflow while processing closetimeo mount option&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;User-provided mount parameter closetimeo of type u32 is intended to have
an upper limit, but before it is validated, the value is converted from
seconds to jiffies which can lead to an integer overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2025-21962)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_free_work_struct&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;amp;gt;interim_entry of ksmbd_work could be deleted after oplock is freed.
We don&amp;amp;apos;t need to manage it with linked list. The interim request could be
immediately sent whenever a oplock break wait is needed.(CVE-2025-21967)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix use-after-free in kerberos authentication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Setting sess-&amp;amp;gt;user = NULL was introduced to fix the dangling pointer
created by ksmbd_free_user. However, it is possible another thread could
be operating on the session and make us…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rapidio: fix an API misues when rio_add_net() fails&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rio_add_net() calls device_register() and fails when device_register()
fails.  Thus, put_device() should be used rather than kfree().  Add
&amp;amp;quot;mport-&amp;amp;gt;net = NULL;&amp;amp;quot; to avoid a use after free issue.(CVE-2025-21934)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs: Fix integer overflow while processing closetimeo mount option&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;User-provided mount parameter closetimeo of type u32 is intended to have
an upper limit, but before it is validated, the value is converted from
seconds to jiffies which can lead to an integer overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2025-21962)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_free_work_struct&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;amp;gt;interim_entry of ksmbd_work could be deleted after oplock is freed.
We don&amp;amp;apos;t need to manage it with linked list. The interim request could be
immediately sent whenever a oplock break wait is needed.(CVE-2025-21967)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix use-after-free in kerberos authentication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Setting sess-&amp;amp;gt;user = NULL was introduced to fix the dangling pointer
created by ksmbd_free_user. However, it is possible another thread could
be operating on the session and make us…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2268</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38334</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38334</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 214 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages. The longer story: Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched. epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down and the kernel to panic. Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time. Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop it bein…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 214 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages. The longer story: Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page-&amp;gt;poison set in arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched. epc_page-&amp;gt;poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don&amp;#39;t want that page to end up added to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down and the kernel to panic. Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including &amp;#34;EWB&amp;#34; which accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the remaining cores seeing the core didn&amp;#39;t enter MCE handler(s) in time. Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop it bein…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38334</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1522 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1522</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
