<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-09675</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-09675</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-09675</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-09675</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38282</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38282</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38282</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0698 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0698</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-314517</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314517</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-314517</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314517</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-38282</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38282</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but
the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t
use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active
counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in
kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently
catch those (rightful) callers between
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen
Ridong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1
	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002
	kernfs_drain			...
	wait_event
	//waiting (active == 0x80000001)
					kernfs_break_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000001
	// continue
					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000002
	...
	kernfs_should_drain_open_files
	// warning occurs
					kernfs_put_active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether.
(This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be
simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but
the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t
use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active
counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in
kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently
catch those (rightful) callers between
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen
Ridong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1
	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002
	kernfs_drain			...
	wait_event
	//waiting (active == 0x80000001)
					kernfs_break_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000001
	// continue
					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000002
	...
	kernfs_should_drain_open_files
	// warning occurs
					kernfs_put_active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether.
(This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be
simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38282</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-546w-ffx9-gj3g</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-546w-ffx9-gj3g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but
the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t
use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active
counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in
kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently
catch those (rightful) callers between
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen
Ridong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1
	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002
	kernfs_drain			...
	wait_event
	//waiting (active == 0x80000001)
					kernfs_break_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000001
	// continue
					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000002
	...
	kernfs_should_drain_open_files
	// warning occurs
					kernfs_put_active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether.
(This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be
simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but
the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t
use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active
counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in
kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently
catch those (rightful) callers between
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen
Ridong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1
	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002
	kernfs_drain			...
	wait_event
	//waiting (active == 0x80000001)
					kernfs_break_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000001
	// continue
					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection
					// active = 0x80000002
	...
	kernfs_should_drain_open_files
	// warning occurs
					kernfs_put_active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether.
(This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be
simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-546w-ffx9-gj3g</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-38282 — kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38282</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-38282</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38282</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-2802 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2802</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev-&amp;amp;gt;rx_q. It should be
validated header size, payload size and total packet size before
processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be
silently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ti: icssg_prueth: Fix NULL pointer dereference in prueth_probe()In the prueth_probe() function, if one of the calls to emac_phy_connect()fails due to of_phy_connect() returning NULL, then the subsequent call tophy_attached_info() will dereference a NULL pointer.Check the return code of emac_phy_connect and fail cleanly if there is anerror.(CVE-2024-38584)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cpufreq: exit() callback is optionalThe exit() callback is optional and shouldn t be called without checkinga valid pointer first.Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn tpresent.(CVE-2024-38615)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removalThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal ofthe driver. However, code doesn t update the respective globalvariable and after insmod — r…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev-&amp;amp;gt;rx_q. It should be
validated header size, payload size and total packet size before
processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be
silently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ti: icssg_prueth: Fix NULL pointer dereference in prueth_probe()In the prueth_probe() function, if one of the calls to emac_phy_connect()fails due to of_phy_connect() returning NULL, then the subsequent call tophy_attached_info() will dereference a NULL pointer.Check the return code of emac_phy_connect and fail cleanly if there is anerror.(CVE-2024-38584)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cpufreq: exit() callback is optionalThe exit() callback is optional and shouldn t be called without checkinga valid pointer first.Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn tpresent.(CVE-2024-38615)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removalThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal ofthe driver. However, code doesn t update the respective globalvariable and after insmod — r…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-2802</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38282</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38282</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 121 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently catch those (rightful) callers between kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen Ridong: 	kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1 	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002 	kernfs_drain			... 	wait_event 	//waiting (active == 0x80000001) 					kernfs_break_active_protection 					// active = 0x80000001 	// continue 					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection 					// active = 0x80000002 	... 	kernfs_should_drain_open_files 	// warning occurs 					kernfs_put_active To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether. (This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 121 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kernfs: Relax constraint in draining guard The active reference lifecycle provides the break/unbreak mechanism but the active reference is not truly active after unbreak -- callers don&amp;#39;t use it afterwards but it&amp;#39;s important for proper pairing of kn-&amp;gt;active counting. Assuming this mechanism is in place, the WARN check in kernfs_should_drain_open_files() is too sensitive -- it may transiently catch those (rightful) callers between kernfs_unbreak_active_protection() and kernfs_put_active() as found out by Chen Ridong: 	kernfs_remove_by_name_ns	kernfs_get_active // active=1 	__kernfs_remove					  // active=0x80000002 	kernfs_drain			... 	wait_event 	//waiting (active == 0x80000001) 					kernfs_break_active_protection 					// active = 0x80000001 	// continue 					kernfs_unbreak_active_protection 					// active = 0x80000002 	... 	kernfs_should_drain_open_files 	// warning occurs 					kernfs_put_active To avoid the false positives (mind panic_on_warn) remove the check altogether. (This is meant as quick fix, I think active reference break/unbreak may be simplified with larger rework.)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38282</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1522 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1522</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
