<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 03:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-09040</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-09040</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-09040</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-09040</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38008</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38008</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0721 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0721</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0721</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0721</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-314368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314368</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-314368</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-38008</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38008</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/*
	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a
	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW
	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully
	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
	 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/*
	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a
	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW
	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully
	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
	 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-qqq6-9fj8-x34c</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qqq6-9fj8-x34c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/*
	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a
	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW
	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully
	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
	 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/*
	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a
	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW
	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully
	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
	 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qqq6-9fj8-x34c</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-1228 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1228</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the
commit ac0a230f719b (&amp;amp;quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid
deadlocks&amp;amp;quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic
context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface
of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing
the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have
the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the
.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,
so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ceph: give up on paths longer than PATH_MAX&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the full path to be built by ceph_mdsc_build_path() happens to be
longer than PATH_MAX, then this function will enter an endless (retry)
loop, effectively blocking the whole task.  Most of the machine
becomes unusable, making this a very simple and effective DoS
vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot imagine why this retry was ever implemented, but it seems
rather useless and harmful to me.  Let&amp;amp;apos;s remove it and fail with
ENAMETOOLONG instead.(CVE-2024-53685)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: hc…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the
commit ac0a230f719b (&amp;amp;quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid
deadlocks&amp;amp;quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic
context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface
of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing
the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have
the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the
.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,
so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ceph: give up on paths longer than PATH_MAX&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the full path to be built by ceph_mdsc_build_path() happens to be
longer than PATH_MAX, then this function will enter an endless (retry)
loop, effectively blocking the whole task.  Most of the machine
becomes unusable, making this a very simple and effective DoS
vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot imagine why this retry was ever implemented, but it seems
rather useless and harmful to me.  Let&amp;amp;apos;s remove it and fail with
ENAMETOOLONG instead.(CVE-2024-53685)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth: hc…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1228</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:21040-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:21040-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38008</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38008</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: 	/* 	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a 	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW 	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully 	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. 	 */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: 	/* 	 * Warn about the &amp;#39;-1&amp;#39; case though; since that means a 	 * decrement is concurrent with a first (0-&amp;gt;1) increment. IOW 	 * people are trying to disable something that wasn&amp;#39;t yet fully 	 * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. 	 */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1350 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1350</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
