<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 01:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-cilium-2025-30163 — Node based network policies may incorrectly allow workload traffic</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cilium-2025-30163</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Node based network policies (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium. This issue affects: Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.16.8 and v1.17.2. Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Node based network policies (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium. This issue affects: Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.16.8 and v1.17.2. Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cilium-2025-30163</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-224688</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-224688</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-224688</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-224688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-30163</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-30163</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Node based network policies (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium. This issue affects: Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.16.8 and v1.17.2. Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Node based network policies (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium. This issue affects: Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.16.8 and v1.17.2. Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-30163</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-c6pf-2v8j-96mc — Cilium node based network policies may incorrectly allow workload traffic</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-c6pf-2v8j-96mc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cilium/cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Node based network policies](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/policy/language/#node-based) (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue was fixed by https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/36657.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive
- Cilium v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Cilium v1.16.8
- Cilium v1.17.2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Acknowledgements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @oblazek  for reporting and fixing this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at [security@cilium.io](mailto:security@cilium.io). This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated as top priority. Please also address any comments or questions on this advisory to the same mailing list.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cilium/cilium&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Node based network policies](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/policy/language/#node-based) (`fromNodes` and `toNodes`) will incorrectly permit traffic to/from non-node endpoints that share the labels specified in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` sections of network policies. Node based network policy is disabled by default in Cilium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue was fixed by https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/36657.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive
- Cilium v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue is fixed in:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Cilium v1.16.8
- Cilium v1.17.2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users can work around this issue by ensuring that the labels used in `fromNodes` and `toNodes` fields are used exclusively by nodes and not by other endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Acknowledgements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @oblazek  for reporting and fixing this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at [security@cilium.io](mailto:security@cilium.io). This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated as top priority. Please also address any comments or questions on this advisory to the same mailing list.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-c6pf-2v8j-96mc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:14937-1 — govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:14937-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:14937-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
