<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-01403</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01403</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-01403</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-01403</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-22090</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22090</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0449 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0449</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-364521</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-364521</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-364521</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-364521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-22090</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22090</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple
tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over
the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied
any page tables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the
PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page
table was not copied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA
if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34;
clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy()
and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll
simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ...
which is also wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation
succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if
anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT
flag after undoing the reservation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will
get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set
then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be
happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation
is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this proc…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple
tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over
the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied
any page tables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the
PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page
table was not copied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA
if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34;
clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy()
and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll
simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ...
which is also wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation
succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if
anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT
flag after undoing the reservation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will
get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set
then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be
happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation
is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this proc…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-526j-rpwr-89fg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple
tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over
the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied
any page tables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the
PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page
table was not copied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA
if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34;
clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy()
and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll
simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ...
which is also wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation
succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if
anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT
flag after undoing the reservation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will
get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set
then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be
happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation
is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this proc…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple
tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over
the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied
any page tables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the
PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page
table was not copied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA
if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34;
clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy()
and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll
simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ...
which is also wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation
succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if
anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT
flag after undoing the reservation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will
get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set
then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be
happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation
is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this proc…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-526j-rpwr-89fg</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-209-04 — Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-209-04</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siemens is preparing fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siemens is preparing fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-209-04</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-22090 — x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-22090</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-22090</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-22090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-1566 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1566</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;amp;apos;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;amp;quot;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;amp;quot;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;amp;quot;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;amp;quot;) which isn&amp;amp;apos;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;amp;apos;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;amp;apos;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;amp;apos;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;amp;quot;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;amp;quot;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;amp;quot;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;amp;quot;) which isn&amp;amp;apos;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;amp;apos;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;amp;apos;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1566</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-019113 — SSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-019113</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siemens has released new versions for several affected products and recommends to update to the latest versions. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Siemens has released new versions for several affected products and recommends to update to the latest versions. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-019113</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-22090</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22090</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 204 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34; clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process wi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 204 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we&amp;#39;ll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about &amp;#34;simply&amp;#34; clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we&amp;#39;ll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let&amp;#39;s fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won&amp;#39;t try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process wi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0844 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
