<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-12039</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12039</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-12039</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12039</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-22072</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22072</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0368 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0368</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0368</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-346767</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346767</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-346767</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346767</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-22072</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22072</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have
a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened
gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,
but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and
kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we
ended up with a leak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang
directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.
One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()
as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was
in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on
root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got
destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix consists of
	* reverting the commit in question
	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem
of gang directory inode.
	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped
in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped
in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0.
	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang
directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have
a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened
gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,
but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and
kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we
ended up with a leak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang
directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.
One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()
as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was
in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on
root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got
destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix consists of
	* reverting the commit in question
	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem
of gang directory inode.
	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped
in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped
in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0.
	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang
directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-v6rx-qqxh-7pj6</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v6rx-qqxh-7pj6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have
a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened
gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,
but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and
kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we
ended up with a leak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang
directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.
One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()
as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was
in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on
root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got
destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix consists of
	* reverting the commit in question
	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem
of gang directory inode.
	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped
in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped
in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0.
	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang
directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have
a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened
gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,
but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and
kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we
ended up with a leak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang
directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.
One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()
as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was
in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on
root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got
destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix consists of
	* reverting the commit in question
	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem
of gang directory inode.
	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped
in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped
in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0.
	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang
directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v6rx-qqxh-7pj6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-22072 — spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-22072</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-22072</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-22072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1463 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1463</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before 456d8aa37d0f (&amp;amp;quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to
avoid use-after-free&amp;amp;quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last
function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,
link-&amp;amp;gt;downstream would point to free&amp;amp;apos;d memory after.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function
removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream
port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which
still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because
pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.
Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is
obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added a check for &amp;amp;quot;read-only&amp;amp;quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`
function to avoid errors…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before 456d8aa37d0f (&amp;amp;quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to
avoid use-after-free&amp;amp;quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last
function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,
link-&amp;amp;gt;downstream would point to free&amp;amp;apos;d memory after.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function
removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream
port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which
still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because
pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.
Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is
obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added a check for &amp;amp;quot;read-only&amp;amp;quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`
function to avoid errors…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1463</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-22072</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22072</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 204 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak. Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed. Fix consists of 	* reverting the commit in question 	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem of gang directory inode. 	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0. 	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 204 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes prior to &amp;#34;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks&amp;#34; we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak. Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way.  Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput().  Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed. Fix consists of 	* reverting the commit in question 	* adding a counter to gang, protected by -&amp;gt;i_rwsem of gang directory inode. 	* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it&amp;#39;s not 0. 	* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0844 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
