<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-12345</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12345</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-12345</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12345</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-22030</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22030</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-22030</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0509 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0509</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0509</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0509</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-320801</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-320801</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-320801</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-320801</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-22030</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22030</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding
the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock
(through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through
crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation
results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the
following scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) Task A running on CPU #1:
    crypto_alloc_acomp_node()
      Holds scomp_lock
      Enters reclaim
      Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Task A is descheduled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) CPU #1 goes offline
    zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)
      Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))
      Calls crypto_free_acomp()
      Waits for scomp_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Task A running on CPU #2:
      Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1
      DEADLOCK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU
acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is
unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for
consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the
future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex
held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_c…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding
the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock
(through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through
crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation
results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the
following scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) Task A running on CPU #1:
    crypto_alloc_acomp_node()
      Holds scomp_lock
      Enters reclaim
      Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Task A is descheduled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) CPU #1 goes offline
    zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)
      Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))
      Calls crypto_free_acomp()
      Waits for scomp_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Task A running on CPU #2:
      Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1
      DEADLOCK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU
acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is
unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for
consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the
future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex
held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_c…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-22030</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7m6p-mvhj-8v99</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7m6p-mvhj-8v99</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding
the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock
(through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through
crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation
results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the
following scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) Task A running on CPU #1:
    crypto_alloc_acomp_node()
      Holds scomp_lock
      Enters reclaim
      Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Task A is descheduled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) CPU #1 goes offline
    zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)
      Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))
      Calls crypto_free_acomp()
      Waits for scomp_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Task A running on CPU #2:
      Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1
      DEADLOCK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU
acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is
unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for
consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the
future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex
held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_c…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding
the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock
(through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through
crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation
results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the
following scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) Task A running on CPU #1:
    crypto_alloc_acomp_node()
      Holds scomp_lock
      Enters reclaim
      Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Task A is descheduled&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3) CPU #1 goes offline
    zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)
      Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))
      Calls crypto_free_acomp()
      Waits for scomp_lock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) Task A running on CPU #2:
      Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1
      DEADLOCK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU
acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is
unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for
consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the
future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex
held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_c…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7m6p-mvhj-8v99</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01919-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01919-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01919-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-22030</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22030</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 77 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead() Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock (through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()). On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex. The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the following scenario: (1) Task A running on CPU #1:     crypto_alloc_acomp_node()       Holds scomp_lock       Enters reclaim       Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) (2) Task A is descheduled (3) CPU #1 goes offline     zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)       Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))       Calls crypto_free_acomp()       Waits for scomp_lock (4) Task A running on CPU #2:       Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1       DEADLOCK Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the future. With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_comp_prepar…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 77 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: zswap: fix crypto_free_acomp() deadlock in zswap_cpu_comp_dead() Currently, zswap_cpu_comp_dead() calls crypto_free_acomp() while holding the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex.  crypto_free_acomp() then holds scomp_lock (through crypto_exit_scomp_ops_async()). On the other hand, crypto_alloc_acomp_node() holds the scomp_lock (through crypto_scomp_init_tfm()), and then allocates memory.  If the allocation results in reclaim, we may attempt to hold the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex. The above dependencies can cause an ABBA deadlock.  For example in the following scenario: (1) Task A running on CPU #1:     crypto_alloc_acomp_node()       Holds scomp_lock       Enters reclaim       Reads per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) (2) Task A is descheduled (3) CPU #1 goes offline     zswap_cpu_comp_dead(CPU #1)       Holds per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1))       Calls crypto_free_acomp()       Waits for scomp_lock (4) Task A running on CPU #2:       Waits for per_cpu_ptr(pool-&amp;gt;acomp_ctx, 1) // Read on CPU #1       DEADLOCK Since there is no requirement to call crypto_free_acomp() with the per-CPU acomp_ctx mutex held in zswap_cpu_comp_dead(), move it after the mutex is unlocked.  Also move the acomp_request_free() and kfree() calls for consistency and to avoid any potential sublte locking dependencies in the future. With this, only setting acomp_ctx fields to NULL occurs with the mutex held.  This is similar to how zswap_cpu_comp_prepar…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-22030</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0844 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
