<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 23:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-11963</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-11963</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-11963</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-11963</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-21889</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21889</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21889</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0449 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0449</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-346700</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346700</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-346700</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346700</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-21889</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21889</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but
currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings
when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
	  perf_iterate_ctx
	  perf_event_exec
	  begin_new_exec
	  ? load_elf_phdrs
	  load_elf_binary
	  ? lock_acquire
	  ? find_held_lock
	  ? bprm_execve
	  bprm_execve
	  do_execveat_common.isra.0
	  __x64_sys_execve
	  do_syscall_64
	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This protection was previously present but was removed in commit
bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the
necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around
perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but
currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings
when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
	  perf_iterate_ctx
	  perf_event_exec
	  begin_new_exec
	  ? load_elf_phdrs
	  load_elf_binary
	  ? lock_acquire
	  ? find_held_lock
	  ? bprm_execve
	  bprm_execve
	  do_execveat_common.isra.0
	  __x64_sys_execve
	  do_syscall_64
	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This protection was previously present but was removed in commit
bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the
necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around
perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21889</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mcf6-fpvv-xxr4</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mcf6-fpvv-xxr4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but
currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings
when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
	  perf_iterate_ctx
	  perf_event_exec
	  begin_new_exec
	  ? load_elf_phdrs
	  load_elf_binary
	  ? lock_acquire
	  ? find_held_lock
	  ? bprm_execve
	  bprm_execve
	  do_execveat_common.isra.0
	  __x64_sys_execve
	  do_syscall_64
	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This protection was previously present but was removed in commit
bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the
necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around
perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but
currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings
when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
	  perf_iterate_ctx
	  perf_event_exec
	  begin_new_exec
	  ? load_elf_phdrs
	  load_elf_binary
	  ? lock_acquire
	  ? find_held_lock
	  ? bprm_execve
	  bprm_execve
	  do_execveat_common.isra.0
	  __x64_sys_execve
	  do_syscall_64
	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This protection was previously present but was removed in commit
bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the
necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around
perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mcf6-fpvv-xxr4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1371 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1371</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;amp;quot;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;amp;quot;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlayfs that is
mounted with options index=on,nfs_export=on also on kernels &amp;amp;lt; v6.6.
Therefore, I am not listing the aforementioned commit as a Fixes commit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backport hint: this patch will have a trivial conflict applying to
v6.6.y, and other trivial conflicts applying to stable kernels &amp;amp;l…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;amp;quot;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;amp;quot;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlayfs that is
mounted with options index=on,nfs_export=on also on kernels &amp;amp;lt; v6.6.
Therefore, I am not listing the aforementioned commit as a Fixes commit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backport hint: this patch will have a trivial conflict applying to
v6.6.y, and other trivial conflicts applying to stable kernels &amp;amp;l…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1371</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-21889</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21889</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 110 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx() The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y: 	WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! 	 Call Trace: 	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious 	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply 	  perf_iterate_ctx 	  perf_event_exec 	  begin_new_exec 	  ? load_elf_phdrs 	  load_elf_binary 	  ? lock_acquire 	  ? find_held_lock 	  ? bprm_execve 	  bprm_execve 	  do_execveat_common.isra.0 	  __x64_sys_execve 	  do_syscall_64 	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe This protection was previously present but was removed in commit bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec(). [ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 110 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx() The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y: 	WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 	kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! 	 Call Trace: 	  lockdep_rcu_suspicious 	  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply 	  perf_iterate_ctx 	  perf_event_exec 	  begin_new_exec 	  ? load_elf_phdrs 	  load_elf_binary 	  ? lock_acquire 	  ? find_held_lock 	  ? bprm_execve 	  bprm_execve 	  do_execveat_common.isra.0 	  __x64_sys_execve 	  do_syscall_64 	  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe This protection was previously present but was removed in commit bd2756811766 (&amp;#34;perf: Rewrite core context handling&amp;#34;). Add back the necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec(). [ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21889</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0649 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0649</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Effekte zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Effekte zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
