<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 07:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-03992</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03992</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-03992</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03992</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-21807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1057 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1057</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1057</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1057</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-338651</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338651</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-338651</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338651</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-21807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the
attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the
store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to
queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may
need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the
hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA
deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing
the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the
device queue limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the
-&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the
queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking
the limits lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as
it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting.
Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the
attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the
store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to
queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may
need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the
hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA
deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing
the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the
device queue limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the
-&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the
queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking
the limits lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as
it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting.
Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-cp43-x3rr-gwcc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cp43-x3rr-gwcc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the
attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the
store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to
queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may
need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the
hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA
deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing
the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the
device queue limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the
-&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the
queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking
the limits lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as
it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting.
Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the
attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the
store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to
queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may
need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the
hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA
deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing
the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the
device queue limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the
-&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the
queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking
the limits lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as
it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting.
Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cp43-x3rr-gwcc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-21807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 75 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the device queue limits. Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the -&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking the limits lock. This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting. Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon. (commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 75 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the device queue limits. Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the -&amp;gt;store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking the limits lock. This also removes taking the sysfs lock for the store_limit method as it doesn&amp;#39;t protect anything here, but creates even more nesting. Hopefully it will go away from the actual sysfs methods entirely soon. (commit log adapted from a similar patch from  Damien Le Moal)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0461 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0461</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
