<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:23:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-07835</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-07835</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-07835</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-07835</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-21632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-21632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0088 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0088</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0088</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0088</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313982</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313982</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313982</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313982</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-21632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers
are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means
that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that
they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state.
Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in
addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler
verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the
thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of
the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not
understood when shadow stack support was put in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with
XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to
return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an
ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack
behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That
check just happened to avoid the warning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks
disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina
Schimpe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers
are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means
that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that
they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state.
Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in
addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler
verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the
thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of
the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not
understood when shadow stack support was put in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with
XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to
return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an
ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack
behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That
check just happened to avoid the warning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks
disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina
Schimpe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-21632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-gjg2-r77w-jx7q</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gjg2-r77w-jx7q</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers
are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means
that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that
they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state.
Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in
addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler
verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the
thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of
the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not
understood when shadow stack support was put in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with
XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to
return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an
ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack
behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That
check just happened to avoid the warning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks
disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina
Schimpe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers
are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means
that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that
they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state.
Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in
addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler
verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the
thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of
the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not
understood when shadow stack support was put in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with
XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to
return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an
ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack
behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That
check just happened to avoid the warning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks
disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina
Schimpe:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gjg2-r77w-jx7q</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1093 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1093</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix potencial out-of-bounds when buffer offset is invalid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found potencial out-of-bounds when buffer offset fields of a few requests
is invalid. This patch set the minimum value of buffer offset field to
-&amp;amp;gt;Buffer offset to validate buffer length.(CVE-2024-26952)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If -&amp;amp;gt;NameOffset of smb2_create_req is smaller than Buffer offset of
smb2_create_req, slab-out-of-bounds read can happen from smb2_open.
This patch set the minimum value of the name offset to the buffer offset
to validate name length of smb2_create_req().(CVE-2024-26954)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the
lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens
to reproduce there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first problem is that lan9303 is unique among DSA drivers in that it
calls dev_get_drvdata() at &amp;amp;quot;arbitrary runtime&amp;amp;quot; (not probe, not shutdown,
not remove):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phy_state_machine()
-&amp;amp;gt; ...
   -&amp;amp;gt; dsa_user_phy_read()
      -&amp;amp;gt; ds-&amp;amp;gt;ops-&amp;amp;gt;phy_read()
         -&amp;amp;gt; lan9303_phy_read()
            -&amp;amp;gt; chip-&amp;amp;gt;ops-&amp;amp;gt;phy_read()
               -&amp;amp;gt; lan9303_mdio_phy_read()
                  -&amp;amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix potencial out-of-bounds when buffer offset is invalid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found potencial out-of-bounds when buffer offset fields of a few requests
is invalid. This patch set the minimum value of buffer offset field to
-&amp;amp;gt;Buffer offset to validate buffer length.(CVE-2024-26952)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If -&amp;amp;gt;NameOffset of smb2_create_req is smaller than Buffer offset of
smb2_create_req, slab-out-of-bounds read can happen from smb2_open.
This patch set the minimum value of the name offset to the buffer offset
to validate name length of smb2_create_req().(CVE-2024-26954)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the
lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens
to reproduce there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first problem is that lan9303 is unique among DSA drivers in that it
calls dev_get_drvdata() at &amp;amp;quot;arbitrary runtime&amp;amp;quot; (not probe, not shutdown,
not remove):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phy_state_machine()
-&amp;amp;gt; ...
   -&amp;amp;gt; dsa_user_phy_read()
      -&amp;amp;gt; ds-&amp;amp;gt;ops-&amp;amp;gt;phy_read()
         -&amp;amp;gt; lan9303_phy_read()
            -&amp;amp;gt; chip-&amp;amp;gt;ops-&amp;amp;gt;phy_read()
               -&amp;amp;gt; lan9303_mdio_phy_read()
                  -&amp;amp;gt;…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1093</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:0289-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:0289-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:0289-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-21632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That check just happened to avoid the warning. But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina Schimpe: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198 ssp_ge…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Ensure shadow stack is active before &amp;#34;getting&amp;#34; registers The x86 shadow stack support has its own set of registers. Those registers are XSAVE-managed, but they are &amp;#34;supervisor state components&amp;#34; which means that userspace can not touch them with XSAVE/XRSTOR.  It also means that they are not accessible from the existing ptrace ABI for XSAVE state. Thus, there is a new ptrace get/set interface for it. The regset code that ptrace uses provides an -&amp;gt;active() handler in addition to the get/set ones. For shadow stack this -&amp;gt;active() handler verifies that shadow stack is enabled via the ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK bit in the thread struct. The -&amp;gt;active() handler is checked from some call sites of the regset get/set handlers, but not the ptrace ones. This was not understood when shadow stack support was put in place. As a result, both the set/get handlers can be called with XFEATURE_CET_USER in its init state, which would cause get_xsave_addr() to return NULL and trigger a WARN_ON(). The ssp_set() handler luckily has an ssp_active() check to avoid surprising the kernel with shadow stack behavior when the kernel is not ready for it (ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK==0). That check just happened to avoid the warning. But the -&amp;gt;get() side wasn&amp;#39;t so lucky. It can be called with shadow stacks disabled, triggering the warning in practice, as reported by Christina Schimpe: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1773 at arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:198 ssp_ge…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-21632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0119 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0119</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
