<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344064</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344064</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344064</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344064</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-14777</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-14777</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-14777</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4cj5-g32w-86fv</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4cj5-g32w-86fv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4cj5-g32w-86fv</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jvndb-2026-026852</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/jvndb-2026-026852</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities exist in Hitachi Ops Center Common Services.&#13;
&#13;
CVE-2025-10939, CVE-2025-11537, CVE-2025-11538, CVE-2025-12110, CVE-2025-13467, CVE-2025-13881, CVE-2025-14082, CVE-2025-14083, CVE-2025-14777, CVE-2025-66560, CVE-2026-0707, CVE-2026-0871, CVE-2026-0976, CVE-2026-1035, CVE-2026-1190, CVE-2026-2092, CVE-2026-2575, CVE-2026-2673, CVE-2026-3009, CVE-2026-3121, CVE-2026-3429, CVE-2026-3872, CVE-2026-3911, CVE-2026-4282, CVE-2026-4325, CVE-2026-4634, CVE-2026-22745, CVE-2026-22748, CVE-2026-25854, CVE-2026-40972, CVE-2026-40975&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Multiple vulnerabilities exist in Hitachi Ops Center Common Services.&#13;
&#13;
CVE-2025-10939, CVE-2025-11537, CVE-2025-11538, CVE-2025-12110, CVE-2025-13467, CVE-2025-13881, CVE-2025-14082, CVE-2025-14083, CVE-2025-14777, CVE-2025-66560, CVE-2026-0707, CVE-2026-0871, CVE-2026-0976, CVE-2026-1035, CVE-2026-1190, CVE-2026-2092, CVE-2026-2575, CVE-2026-2673, CVE-2026-3009, CVE-2026-3121, CVE-2026-3429, CVE-2026-3872, CVE-2026-3911, CVE-2026-4282, CVE-2026-4325, CVE-2026-4634, CVE-2026-22745, CVE-2026-22748, CVE-2026-25854, CVE-2026-40972, CVE-2026-40975&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/jvndb-2026-026852</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:6477 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.11 Update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:6477</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;keycloak-services: Keycloak Admin REST API: Improper Access Control leads to sensitive role metadata information disclosure keycloak-server: Keycloak: Improper Access Control in Admin REST API leads to information disclosure keycloak: Keycloak IDOR in realm client creating/deleting org.keycloak.protocol.oidc: Keycloak Refresh Token Reuse Bypass via TOCTOU Race Condition org.keycloak.protocol.oidc: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Keycloak OIDC Dynamic Client Registration via jwks_uri keycloak: Keycloak: Information disclosure via authorization bypass in Admin API keycloak: org.keycloak/keycloak-services: Keycloak: Privilege escalation via manage-clients permission keycloak: Keycloak: Information Disclosure via improper role enforcement in UMA 2.0 Protection API org.keycloak.services.resources.account: Improper Access Control Leading to MFA Deletion and Account Takeover in Keycloak Account REST API keycloak: Keycloak: Information disclosure due to redirect_uri validation bypass org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.UserResource: Keycloak: Information disclosure of disabled user attributes via administrative endpoint keycloak: Keycloak: Privilege escalation via forged authorization codes due to SingleUseObjectProvider isolation flaw keycloak: Keycloak: Replay of action tokens via improper handling of single-use entries keycloak: Keycloak: Denial of Service via excessive processing of OpenID Connect scope parameters keycloak: Keycloak: UMA policy bypass allows authen…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;keycloak-services: Keycloak Admin REST API: Improper Access Control leads to sensitive role metadata information disclosure keycloak-server: Keycloak: Improper Access Control in Admin REST API leads to information disclosure keycloak: Keycloak IDOR in realm client creating/deleting org.keycloak.protocol.oidc: Keycloak Refresh Token Reuse Bypass via TOCTOU Race Condition org.keycloak.protocol.oidc: Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Keycloak OIDC Dynamic Client Registration via jwks_uri keycloak: Keycloak: Information disclosure via authorization bypass in Admin API keycloak: org.keycloak/keycloak-services: Keycloak: Privilege escalation via manage-clients permission keycloak: Keycloak: Information Disclosure via improper role enforcement in UMA 2.0 Protection API org.keycloak.services.resources.account: Improper Access Control Leading to MFA Deletion and Account Takeover in Keycloak Account REST API keycloak: Keycloak: Information disclosure due to redirect_uri validation bypass org.keycloak.services.resources.admin.UserResource: Keycloak: Information disclosure of disabled user attributes via administrative endpoint keycloak: Keycloak: Privilege escalation via forged authorization codes due to SingleUseObjectProvider isolation flaw keycloak: Keycloak: Replay of action tokens via improper handling of single-use entries keycloak: Keycloak: Denial of Service via excessive processing of OpenID Connect scope parameters keycloak: Keycloak: UMA policy bypass allows authen…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:6477</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2848 — Keycloak: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2848</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Keycloak ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Keycloak ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
