<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15231</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15231</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15231</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15231</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-58240</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58240</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58240</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0825</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-355960</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-355960</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-355960</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-355960</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-58240</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58240</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58240</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-fpx7-665w-c5c9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fpx7-665w-c5c9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no
reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us
up and return its result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a
UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between
async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-fpx7-665w-c5c9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-58240 — tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-58240</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-58240</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-58240</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</link>
      <description>NCSC-2026-0147</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2025:19268 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel-rt security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:19268</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: Fix potential buffer overflow by snprintf() kernel: mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows kernel: RDMA/irdma: Fix a window for use-after-free kernel: KVM: SVM: Don&amp;#39;t BUG if userspace injects an interrupt with GIF=0 kernel: net: usb: smsc75xx: Limit packet length to skb-&amp;gt;len kernel: crypto: seqiv - Handle EBUSY correctly kernel: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async kernel: HID: core: Harden s32ton() against conversion to 0 bits kernel: eventpoll: Fix semi-unbounded recursion kernel: Linux kernel ALSA hda/ca0132 buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: Fix potential buffer overflow by snprintf() kernel: mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows kernel: RDMA/irdma: Fix a window for use-after-free kernel: KVM: SVM: Don&amp;#39;t BUG if userspace injects an interrupt with GIF=0 kernel: net: usb: smsc75xx: Limit packet length to skb-&amp;gt;len kernel: crypto: seqiv - Handle EBUSY correctly kernel: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async kernel: HID: core: Harden s32ton() against conversion to 0 bits kernel: eventpoll: Fix semi-unbounded recursion kernel: Linux kernel ALSA hda/ca0132 buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:19268</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&#13;
&#13;
drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&amp;gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it&#13;
&#13;
[WHAT &amp;amp; HOW]&#13;
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res&#13;
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for&#13;
null before dereferencing.&#13;
&#13;
This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &amp;gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&amp;gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 (&amp;#34;ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles&amp;#34;) in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&amp;gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:03600-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-58240</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58240</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 142 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us up and return its result. We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it. This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 142 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async If we&amp;#39;re not doing async, the handling is much simpler. There&amp;#39;s no reference counting, we just need to wait for the completion to wake us up and return its result. We should preferably also use a separate crypto_wait. I&amp;#39;m not seeing a UAF as I did in the past, I think aec7961916f3 (&amp;#34;tls: fix race between async notify and socket close&amp;#34;) took care of it. This will make the next fix easier.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58240</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1921 — Linux Kernel: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1921</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
