<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:45:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-04485</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04485</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-04485</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-04485</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-58096</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58096</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58096</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0449 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0449</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-346602</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346602</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-346602</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346602</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-58096</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58096</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58096</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-wgqx-9hcf-wpvq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wgqx-9hcf-wpvq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wgqx-9hcf-wpvq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-58096 — wifi: ath11k: add srng-&gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-58096</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-58096</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-58096</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1572 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1572</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;amp;apos;s definition from
&amp;amp;apos;void&amp;amp;apos; to &amp;amp;apos;struct hal_srng&amp;amp;apos;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1(CVE-2024-58096)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been res…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;amp;apos;s definition from
&amp;amp;apos;void&amp;amp;apos; to &amp;amp;apos;struct hal_srng&amp;amp;apos;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1(CVE-2024-58096)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been res…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1572</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-58096</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58096</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 153 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data. For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock. So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur: RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] Call Trace:  ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]  ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]  ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]  ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]  __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0  net_rx_action+0x198/0x320  __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319 So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings. Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from &amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx(). Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 153 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data. For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock. So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur: RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] Call Trace:  ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]  ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]  ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]  ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]  __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0  net_rx_action+0x198/0x320  __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319 So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings. Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from &amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx(). Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58096</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0844 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
