<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 23:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-12235</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12235</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-12235</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12235</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-58001</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58001</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-58001</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0277 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Elles permettent à un attaquant de p…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0277</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0277</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0277</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313945</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313945</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313945</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313945</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-58001</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58001</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a
giant patch for review ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches
where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it;
his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our
bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the
changes I made to his code!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 23):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a
giant patch for review ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches
where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it;
his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our
bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the
changes I made to his code!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 23):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-58001</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-wj2h-7vcx-3r7w</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wj2h-7vcx-3r7w</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a
giant patch for review ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches
where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it;
his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our
bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the
changes I made to his code!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 23):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a
giant patch for review ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches
where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it;
his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our
bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the
changes I made to his code!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 23):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wj2h-7vcx-3r7w</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1283 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1283</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: sfc: add missing xdp queue reinitialization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After rx/tx ring buffer size is changed, kernel panic occurs when
it acts XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When tx/rx ring buffer size is changed(ethtool -G), sfc driver
reallocates and reinitializes rx and tx queues and their buffer
(tx_queue-&amp;amp;gt;buffer).
But it misses reinitializing xdp queues(efx-&amp;amp;gt;xdp_tx_queues).
So, while it is acting XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT, it uses the uninitialized
tx_queue-&amp;amp;gt;buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new function efx_set_xdp_channels() is separated from efx_set_channels()
to handle only xdp queues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Splat looks like:
   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000002a
   #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
   #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
   PGD 0 P4D 0
   Oops: 0002 [#4] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
   RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc]
   CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G      D           5.17.0+ #55 e8beeee8289528f11357029357cf
   Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80
   RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e45c60 EFLAGS: 00010297
   RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc]
   RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea506895c0 RCX: ffffffffc0330870
   RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001139b10ce RDI: ffff92ea506895c0
   RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001139b110d R09: 0000000000000000
   R10: 0000000…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: sfc: add missing xdp queue reinitialization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After rx/tx ring buffer size is changed, kernel panic occurs when
it acts XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When tx/rx ring buffer size is changed(ethtool -G), sfc driver
reallocates and reinitializes rx and tx queues and their buffer
(tx_queue-&amp;amp;gt;buffer).
But it misses reinitializing xdp queues(efx-&amp;amp;gt;xdp_tx_queues).
So, while it is acting XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT, it uses the uninitialized
tx_queue-&amp;amp;gt;buffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new function efx_set_xdp_channels() is separated from efx_set_channels()
to handle only xdp queues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Splat looks like:
   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000002a
   #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
   #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
   PGD 0 P4D 0
   Oops: 0002 [#4] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
   RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc]
   CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G      D           5.17.0+ #55 e8beeee8289528f11357029357cf
   Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80
   RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e45c60 EFLAGS: 00010297
   RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc]
   RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea506895c0 RCX: ffffffffc0330870
   RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001139b10ce RDI: ffff92ea506895c0
   RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001139b110d R09: 0000000000000000
   R10: 0000000…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1283</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-58001</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58001</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;. Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a giant patch for review ;-) So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it; his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the changes I made to his code! This patch (of 23): If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: handle a symlink read error correctly Patch series &amp;#34;Convert ocfs2 to use folios&amp;#34;. Mark did a conversion of ocfs2 to use folios and sent it to me as a giant patch for review ;-) So I&amp;#39;ve redone it as individual patches, and credited Mark for the patches where his code is substantially the same.  It&amp;#39;s not a bad way to do it; his patch had some bugs and my patches had some bugs.  Hopefully all our bugs were different from each other.  And hopefully Mark likes all the changes I made to his code! This patch (of 23): If we can&amp;#39;t read the buffer, be sure to unlock the page before returning.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-58001</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0453 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0453</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
