<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 11:02:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-03291</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03291</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-03291</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03291</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-57974</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-57974</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-57974</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0307 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0307</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313932</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313932</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313932</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313932</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-57974</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-57974</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;#39;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as
apparent from the following reproducer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))
  dd if…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;#39;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as
apparent from the following reproducer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))
  dd if…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-57974</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-hqjf-7m9j-v4qc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hqjf-7m9j-v4qc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;#39;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as
apparent from the following reproducer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))
  dd if…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;#39;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as
apparent from the following reproducer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))
  dd if…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-hqjf-7m9j-v4qc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-57974 — udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-57974</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-57974</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-57974</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-1566 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1566</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;amp;apos;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;amp;quot;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;amp;quot;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;amp;quot;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;amp;quot;) which isn&amp;amp;apos;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;amp;apos;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;amp;apos;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;amp;apos;s receiving
datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which
a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed
but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple
hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;amp;quot;udp:
bind() optimisation&amp;amp;quot;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became
needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;amp;quot;udp: add
rehash on connect()&amp;amp;quot;) which isn&amp;amp;apos;t however a complete fix: the
socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while
it&amp;amp;apos;s pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a
client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first
datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to
the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to
send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;amp;apos;s socket changes its
address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed
lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1566</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01919-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01919-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01919-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-57974</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-57974</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated. Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp: bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect(). This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while it&amp;#39;s pending. This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow. Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as apparent from the following reproducer:   LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))   dd if=/dev/u…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 198 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udp: Deal with race between UDP socket address change and rehash If a UDP socket changes its local address while it&amp;#39;s receiving datagrams, as a result of connect(), there is a period during which a lookup operation might fail to find it, after the address is changed but before the secondary hash (port and address) and the four-tuple hash (local and remote ports and addresses) are updated. Secondary hash chains were introduced by commit 30fff9231fad (&amp;#34;udp: bind() optimisation&amp;#34;) and, as a result, a rehash operation became needed to make a bound socket reachable again after a connect(). This operation was introduced by commit 719f835853a9 (&amp;#34;udp: add rehash on connect()&amp;#34;) which isn&amp;#39;t however a complete fix: the socket will be found once the rehashing completes, but not while it&amp;#39;s pending. This is noticeable with a socat(1) server in UDP4-LISTEN mode, and a client sending datagrams to it. After the server receives the first datagram (cf. _xioopen_ipdgram_listen()), it issues a connect() to the address of the sender, in order to set up a directed flow. Now, if the client, running on a different CPU thread, happens to send a (subsequent) datagram while the server&amp;#39;s socket changes its address, but is not rehashed yet, this will result in a failed lookup and a port unreachable error delivered to the client, as apparent from the following reproducer:   LEN=$(($(cat /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default) / 4))   dd if=/dev/u…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-57974</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0453 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0453</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
