https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:27:37 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-00027 bdu:2025-00027 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-00027 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-kafka-2024-56128 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: kafka</p> <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: kafka</p> <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-kafka-2024-56128 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0641 certfr-2025-avi-0641 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0641 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-207378 EUVD-2026-207378 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-207378 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56128 <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56128 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p7c9-8xx8-h74f <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.13, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.12, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.11, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.10</p> <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.13, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.12, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.11, Maven: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.10</p> <p>Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation.</p> <p>Issue Summary: Apache Kafka&#39;s implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka&#39;s SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.</p> <p>Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.</p> <p>How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASL_PLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.</p> <p>Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.</p> <p>Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 thro…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-p7c9-8xx8-h74f https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:12511 <p>json-smart: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in json-smart (Resource Exhaustion) org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: jetty: Jetty URI parsing of invalid authority jetty-server: Jetty: Gzip Request Body Buffer Corruption kafka-clients: privilege escalation to filesystem read-access via automatic ConfigProvider netty: Denial of Service attack on windows app using Netty kafka: Apache Kafka: SCRAM authentication vulnerable to replay attacks when used without encryption io.quarkus:quarkus-resteasy: Memory Leak in Quarkus RESTEasy Classic When Client Requests Timeout io.netty:netty-handler: SslHandler doesn&#39;t correctly validate packets which can lead to native crash when using native SSLEngine netty: Denial of Service attack on windows app using Netty commons-beanutils: Apache Commons BeanUtils: PropertyUtilsBean does not suppresses an enum&#39;s declaredClass property by default commons-lang/commons-lang: org.apache.commons/commons-lang3: Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Commons Lang io.quarkus/quarkus-vertx: Quarkus potential data leak com.nimbusds/nimbus-jose-jwt: Uncontrolled recursion in Connect2id Nimbus JOSE + JWT</p> <p>json-smart: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in json-smart (Resource Exhaustion) org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: jetty: Jetty URI parsing of invalid authority jetty-server: Jetty: Gzip Request Body Buffer Corruption kafka-clients: privilege escalation to filesystem read-access via automatic ConfigProvider netty: Denial of Service attack on windows app using Netty kafka: Apache Kafka: SCRAM authentication vulnerable to replay attacks when used without encryption io.quarkus:quarkus-resteasy: Memory Leak in Quarkus RESTEasy Classic When Client Requests Timeout io.netty:netty-handler: SslHandler doesn&#39;t correctly validate packets which can lead to native crash when using native SSLEngine netty: Denial of Service attack on windows app using Netty commons-beanutils: Apache Commons BeanUtils: PropertyUtilsBean does not suppresses an enum&#39;s declaredClass property by default commons-lang/commons-lang: org.apache.commons/commons-lang3: Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Commons Lang io.quarkus/quarkus-vertx: Quarkus potential data leak com.nimbusds/nimbus-jose-jwt: Uncontrolled recursion in Connect2id Nimbus JOSE + JWT</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2025:12511 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3725 <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Apache Kafka ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.</p> <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Apache Kafka ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3725