<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15075</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15075</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15075</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-53079</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53079</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53079</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2024-avi-1102 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1102</link>
      <description>certfr-2024-avi-1102</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1102</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2024-46449</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46449</link>
      <description>cnvd-2024-46449</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-346384</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346384</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-346384</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346384</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-53079</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53079</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
&amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
&amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53079</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
&amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
&amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-53079 — mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53079</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-53079</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53079</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2025-1204 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1204</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a
combination of tail calls and freplace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of
tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in
entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;entry_tc -&amp;amp;gt; subprog_tc -&amp;amp;gt; entry_freplace --tailcall-&amp;amp;gt; entry_tc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to
zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism
to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this issue, the solution is twofold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a
   prog_array map.
2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map
   with an freplace program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This ensures that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program,
  it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map.
* If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its
  subprograms can be extended by an freplace program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return
-EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a
prog_array map.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, fix a minor code s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a
combination of tail calls and freplace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of
tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in
entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;entry_tc -&amp;amp;gt; subprog_tc -&amp;amp;gt; entry_freplace --tailcall-&amp;amp;gt; entry_tc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to
zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism
to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix this issue, the solution is twofold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a
   prog_array map.
2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map
   with an freplace program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This ensures that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program,
  it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map.
* If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its
  subprograms can be extended by an freplace program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return
-EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a
prog_array map.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, fix a minor code s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1204</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2024:4314-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4314-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4314-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53079</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53079</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 168 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 168 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, &amp;#34;Bad page state&amp;#34;s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don&amp;#39;t get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent changes being 6.8&amp;#39;s mTHP, 6.10&amp;#39;s mTHP swapout, and 6.12&amp;#39;s mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&amp;gt;memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53079</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3509 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
