<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-15072</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15072</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-15072</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15072</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-53075</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53075</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0152 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0152</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0152</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0152</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313601</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313601</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313601</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313601</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-53075</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53075</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node
at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a
specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for
the node that was acquired.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we
can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and
we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node.
This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring
the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node
at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a
specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for
the node that was acquired.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we
can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and
we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node.
This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring
the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7866-w9g3-g699</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7866-w9g3-g699</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node
at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a
specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for
the node that was acquired.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we
can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and
we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node.
This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring
the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node
at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a
specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for
the node that was acquired.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we
can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and
we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node.
This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring
the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7866-w9g3-g699</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53075</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53075</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 69 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for the node that was acquired. Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node. This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node. Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 69 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: Prevent a bad reference count on CPU nodes When populating cache leaves we previously fetched the CPU device node at the very beginning. But when ACPI is enabled we go through a specific branch which returns early and does not call &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; for the node that was acquired. Since we are not using a CPU device node for the ACPI code anyways, we can simply move the initialization of it just passed the ACPI block, and we are guaranteed to have an &amp;#39;of_node_put&amp;#39; call for the acquired node. This prevents a bad reference count of the CPU device node. Moreover, the previous function did not check for errors when acquiring the device node, so a return -ENOENT has been added for that case.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53075</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3509 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
